{"id":"W2051757640","doi":"10.1139/b00-002","title":"Searching for the taxonomic position of the African genus <i>Colletoecema</i> (Rubiaceae): morphology and anatomy compared to an <i>rps</i>16-intron analysis of the Rubioideae","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Botany","topic":"Plant Diversity and Evolution","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew","keywords":"Biology; Genus; Anatomy; Morphology (biology); Tribe; Clade; Subfamily; Cladistics; Comparative anatomy; Zoology; Botany; Evolutionary biology; Phylogenetics; Genetics; Gene","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003542096,0.00006789563,0.000198706,0.00004399794,0.0003778294,0.00002778147,0.0003943299,0.00004238948,0.0001182445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002928263,0.00002322171,0.0001622743,0.0005221282,0.0001454426,0.00007405982,0.00001846564,0.0001057581,4.832827e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008914853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007195512,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01848646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2078462,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999272,0.0001326603,0.0002081959,0.0000926781,0.0001080229,0.0001864634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993554,0.0001410135,0.0001788872,0.00007047815,0.0000828804,0.00017135],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001641429,0.0002382719,0.3569427,0.0000355466,0.002668762,0.00003952157,0.005734818,0.02733638,0.462247,0.001662223,0.03137971,0.1100736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002171133,0.0001901885,0.9729804,0.000024297,0.000447867,0.00005485646,0.001435998,0.001162486,0.0008585324,0.0001380937,0.02239492,0.00009521018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.993915,0.0001578168,0.000009936555,0.005095553,0.00007598284,0.0001840142,0.0004160755,0.000001213191,0.0001444524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994362,0.00002508866,0.00003607829,0.000391683,0.00005626993,0.000001147884,0.000004088952,5.616149e-7,0.00004888497],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6160377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9880495,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.014029324064504,"score_gpt":0.1971620659317699,"score_spread":0.1831327418672659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}