{"id":"W2051757640","doi":"10.1139/b00-002","title":"Searching for the taxonomic position of the African genus <i>Colletoecema</i> (Rubiaceae): morphology and anatomy compared to an <i>rps</i>16-intron analysis of the Rubioideae","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Botany","topic":"Plant Diversity and Evolution","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew","keywords":"Biology; Genus; Anatomy; Morphology (biology); Tribe; Clade; Subfamily; Cladistics; Comparative anatomy; Zoology; Botany; Evolutionary biology; Phylogenetics; Genetics; Gene","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001330314,0.0001734639,0.0001721164,0.001040819,0.0003315835,0.0003207291,0.0002294511,0.0001907451,0.001560732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003051449,0.00007145021,0.000209552,0.0007686033,0.0001970706,0.0002818174,0.0003316895,0.0002871249,0.0003964588],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001502224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001778884,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001526193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002207274,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999354,0.000007652966,0.000004515371,0.00002575325,0.000008637453,0.00001812163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998179,0.00003522694,0.00006543103,0.00001769606,0.00002464764,0.00003903189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003980681,0.00003827952,0.08361585,0.0002745097,0.00005088691,0.000899769,0.001765595,0.0001446865,0.8460655,0.0006502024,0.0001583283,0.06593825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001450731,0.0001884572,0.9607225,0.00006204185,0.00007571479,0.003088206,0.001820642,0.0007722179,0.01765405,0.0003495768,0.01522957,0.00002250625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965653,0.0006948562,0.0008299254,0.00003769523,0.000004255818,0.000008951884,0.0001838752,0.00001953003,0.001655631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932472,0.000504793,0.004352028,0.00003521418,0.000009199774,0.00001035486,0.001090897,0.00001267025,0.0007376776],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001560732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005221128,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.014029324064504,"score_gpt":0.1971620659317699,"score_spread":0.1831327418672659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}