{"id":"W2051791843","doi":"10.1002/(sici)1099-1085(200005)14:7<1305::aid-hyp44>3.0.co;2-e","title":"Assessment of evapotranspiration models applied to a watershed of Canadian Prairies with mixed land-uses","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hydrological Processes","topic":"Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Stantec (Canada)","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Evapotranspiration; Environmental science; Potential evaporation; Hydrology (agriculture); Water balance; Streamflow; Watershed; Atmosphere (unit); Drainage basin; Atmospheric sciences; Meteorology; Geology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008503166,0.00009572643,0.0001649447,0.00006699234,0.00004837035,0.000009964215,0.0001288568,0.00006075596,0.000368893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004559738,0.00006200147,0.00001507353,0.0004136304,0.0001201765,0.0001087313,0.00001261403,0.00005242974,0.00001143893],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002823076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004099368,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01080929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0778667,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992524,0.00001633468,0.0001766388,0.0001863937,0.0001959185,0.0001722476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997251,0.0000215797,0.00004144196,0.0001010493,0.00001373107,0.00009711531],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005993148,0.00007308034,0.04243512,0.00003552529,0.00001044023,0.000002693138,0.0002558636,0.954432,0.001595954,0.0003546951,0.00001472687,0.0007299921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003302414,0.004375347,0.471754,0.0002034485,0.0003164868,0.00006351411,0.0001120471,0.4568335,0.02634176,0.02259227,0.01220583,0.001899286],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9657321,0.00000643501,0.001161237,0.000260719,0.000003783007,0.0002156178,0.00003134451,0.00001833856,0.03257041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976861,0.00001982679,0.002005496,0.0001216873,0.00000333467,0.00003510498,0.00003582437,0.000005156126,0.00008742097],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4975984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957778,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01428036886717242,"score_gpt":0.2034081787843024,"score_spread":0.18912780991713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}