{"id":"W2051810167","doi":"10.1111/ddi.12146","title":"Assessing conservation regionalization schemes: employing a beta diversity metric to test the environmental surrogacy approach","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Space Agency","keywords":"Thematic map; Beta diversity; Geography; Ecology; Metric (unit); Environmental resource management; Redundancy (engineering); Biodiversity; Cartography; Computer science; Environmental science; Biology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01960096,0.0005492941,0.0003945952,0.002003508,0.0005360168,0.001185901,0.00089293,0.0006564007,0.001286372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05032032,0.0002019216,0.0006194474,0.001335436,0.001003643,0.001390852,0.00179792,0.0007046571,0.0001485658],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008642734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006783721,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002590557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002907922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9911683,0.006102791,0.0004691442,0.0009978531,0.001056143,0.0002056817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9571017,0.03091613,0.00462459,0.003679122,0.003059746,0.0006186721],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001353829,0.0003802298,0.7005737,0.0001571123,0.0007649771,0.0001541514,0.000843971,0.1524534,0.006355169,0.007102165,0.0008967154,0.1289645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001628585,0.002282383,0.2679385,0.00007361178,0.000229103,0.0002747632,0.0009410754,0.7079974,0.01247105,0.005246435,0.002302939,0.00007989043],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9142836,0.0001279974,0.08104131,0.0001123674,0.00002189992,0.0001550539,0.000267784,0.0001408783,0.003848993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9576406,0.00001346153,0.04193667,0.00001863406,0.000004820007,0.00005706679,0.0001546655,0.00001236846,0.0001617629],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01960096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103661,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03237405517747714,"score_gpt":0.2321682503307034,"score_spread":0.1997941951532262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}