{"id":"W2051847040","doi":"10.1016/j.epsr.2010.06.002","title":"Review of reduction techniques in the determination of composite system adequacy equivalents","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electric Power Systems Research","topic":"Power System Reliability and Maintenance","field":"Engineering","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Reliability engineering; Electric power system; Reduction (mathematics); Computer science; Composite number; Power (physics); Engineering; Mathematics; Algorithm; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006928228,0.0001286178,0.0003941942,0.0004690819,0.00004660468,0.00002211343,0.0005797696,0.0001367334,0.000004116954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002736726,0.00009637463,0.00007732972,0.001508183,0.00006911367,0.0001449889,0.00003578626,0.0006681335,0.000009567935],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001857869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006562161,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002652735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008730019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972096,0.0006497934,0.0007817707,0.0001997626,0.0007609666,0.0003980922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984598,0.0002453795,0.0001312903,0.0006379737,0.0004825604,0.00004299412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005068562,0.0002499683,0.0003678929,0.1086802,0.00004902391,0.00001849856,0.001481139,0.00002372951,0.8619112,0.006165924,0.009391169,0.01161051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001678741,0.001921224,0.004039526,0.1527222,0.0001033479,0.002090555,0.002819533,0.04280321,0.6711478,0.0003343986,0.1188195,0.00151998],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5739059,0.2600119,0.03496796,0.0005510533,0.007438254,0.01827754,0.00007150794,0.001047985,0.1037279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974846,0.002064374,0.00008643688,0.000003245112,0.00004459282,0.0002429651,0.000003144054,0.00001904287,0.00005159079],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4235787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3930043,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02438967923008481,"score_gpt":0.3243201569742982,"score_spread":0.2999304777442133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}