{"id":"W2051847040","doi":"10.1016/j.epsr.2010.06.002","title":"Review of reduction techniques in the determination of composite system adequacy equivalents","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electric Power Systems Research","topic":"Power System Reliability and Maintenance","field":"Engineering","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Reliability engineering; Electric power system; Reduction (mathematics); Computer science; Composite number; Power (physics); Engineering; Mathematics; Algorithm; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002059073,0.0009780336,0.001593052,0.002623708,0.0003101852,0.001718063,0.001509791,0.00057556,0.002713513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005677513,0.0005488338,0.0007691449,0.003637158,0.0006609273,0.001261689,0.0007041956,0.001333686,0.001660496],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003554217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005670481,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001306059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001653604,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998651,0.0004109346,0.0001216138,0.0002002884,0.0005808428,0.00003529862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972691,0.001596747,0.0001455074,0.000273226,0.0006938829,0.00002149019],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009478568,0.00005214244,0.0007039599,0.002029483,0.0001420032,0.0001375095,0.00007221154,0.0390774,0.006959992,0.06191112,0.005007747,0.8838117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000808254,0.0003383335,0.007082788,0.001385217,0.0004808189,0.001926098,0.0001935003,0.5323752,0.0272786,0.1742317,0.254419,0.0002080367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.002676187,0.05213167,0.9367418,0.0001815632,0.0002356622,0.00004833599,0.0001217645,0.0001942616,0.007668808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08014362,0.0854555,0.826722,0.0001582376,0.0008660171,0.0001516424,0.0006525508,0.0002632348,0.005587192],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002713513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01088953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02438967923008481,"score_gpt":0.3243201569742982,"score_spread":0.2999304777442133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}