{"id":"W2051866975","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.07.021","title":"Propensity-score matching in the cardiovascular surgery literature from 2004 to 2006: A systematic review and suggestions for improvement","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","topic":"Advanced Causal Inference Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":598,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences","keywords":"Propensity score matching; Systematic review; Matching (statistics); Medicine; MEDLINE; General surgery; Surgery; Political science; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04690378,0.00159779,0.0129872,0.01088956,0.000633801,0.002926758,0.002755844,0.002086148,0.003196317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1364134,0.001339023,0.01428071,0.01446768,0.001307793,0.004267544,0.002270395,0.001716677,0.0002397552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003067232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01806114,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006703288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02048842,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9665933,0.01665877,0.01052456,0.002634339,0.003213348,0.0003756809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8939812,0.08120663,0.01660139,0.002179668,0.00553621,0.0004948701],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006999846,0.00005450568,0.006894065,0.7202207,0.07717006,0.0001230075,0.0002836117,0.000689202,0.0001786061,0.00126309,0.003135069,0.1892881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002648001,0.000743149,0.02451222,0.4401195,0.4955629,0.0006783635,0.0006620529,0.001150823,0.0005959463,0.006676752,0.02649577,0.0001544627],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001372962,0.9953467,0.00151867,0.0009595946,0.0001998291,0.000240783,0.000249198,0.00001243989,0.00009985153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03949598,0.9491074,0.008787117,0.001168058,0.0002918047,0.0006590014,0.0003850369,0.000009346149,0.00009620495],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9870128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2480538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.19215338945083,"score_gpt":0.4069807759266218,"score_spread":0.2148273864757918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}