{"id":"W2051944022","doi":"10.1037/lhb0000095","title":"Suspect filler similarity in eyewitness lineups: A literature review and a novel methodology.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Law and Human Behavior","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Suspect; Eyewitness identification; Similarity (geometry); Psychology; Identification (biology); Culprit; Legal psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Data mining; Criminology; Psychiatry; Relation (database); Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007871853,0.001257462,0.002497546,0.03204457,0.001037835,0.003052425,0.001906596,0.001977282,0.004480781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02478909,0.0008214841,0.002665891,0.02281751,0.001426037,0.006170404,0.002021051,0.001343106,0.0007793847],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002408081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01227452,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005872046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01707089,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961032,0.001080679,0.001343423,0.0004407088,0.0009340087,0.00009795784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9688869,0.02050131,0.004983631,0.0005071413,0.004724022,0.0003970356],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001872687,0.0002037407,0.003890263,0.4834066,0.0009748407,0.0007096034,0.001690744,0.0001394523,0.0008980739,0.00372777,0.01584015,0.4883314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001673236,0.000690018,0.03194476,0.6619844,0.01401397,0.00446133,0.00575503,0.0004830813,0.001172366,0.004681603,0.2744425,0.0002036154],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00176232,0.9932967,0.0009634831,0.001446724,0.0003288726,0.0005541299,0.0004999777,0.00002479788,0.00112307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01487204,0.9765868,0.004670494,0.001478216,0.0002862313,0.001070633,0.000568703,0.00001086773,0.0004560744],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03204457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0416308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2167641062342894,"score_gpt":0.4385898841303565,"score_spread":0.2218257778960672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}