{"id":"W2051944022","doi":"10.1037/lhb0000095","title":"Suspect filler similarity in eyewitness lineups: A literature review and a novel methodology.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Law and Human Behavior","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Suspect; Eyewitness identification; Similarity (geometry); Psychology; Identification (biology); Culprit; Legal psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Data mining; Criminology; Psychiatry; Relation (database); Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007580291,0.0004922068,0.002119154,0.0001222094,0.0002410204,0.0001986194,0.000374413,0.0003884485,0.0001380345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002367534,0.0003487269,0.0001698796,0.0003213859,0.0003639313,0.0002063417,0.0001976498,0.0008209054,0.000005577422],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001697824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004203156,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003569456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001215044,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973888,0.000455876,0.0006872764,0.000965487,0.0001657588,0.0003368477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986994,0.0003556737,0.0003271466,0.0004446107,0.00004592097,0.0001272374],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001299172,0.0006849843,0.00008896899,0.491262,0.00002938075,0.0004872659,0.0004418284,6.840805e-8,0.000361706,0.2375895,0.0006009956,0.2684403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000225926,0.0001000933,0.00004862072,0.03733473,0.0008974221,0.0003689007,0.000002866843,2.550894e-7,0.00001888786,0.000322547,0.9601769,0.0005028147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001923833,0.9973592,0.000004474858,0.00004160414,0.0001118827,0.001072932,0.0001040217,0.00003886327,0.001074678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00009254275,0.9963056,0.0001954132,0.002378075,0.0001104865,0.0002229754,0.00002848122,0.00003663197,0.0006298015],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.959576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998965,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2167641062342894,"score_gpt":0.4385898841303565,"score_spread":0.2218257778960672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}