{"id":"W2051952377","doi":"10.1139/f08-172","title":"Terrestrial carbon contribution to lake food webs: could the classical stable isotope approach be misleading?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Phytoplankton; Zooplankton; Stable isotope ratio; Environmental science; Algae; Isotopes of carbon; Food web; Isotope analysis; Ecology; Oceanography; Nutrient; Biology; Total organic carbon; Ecosystem; Geology; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00669184,0.0008463024,0.00113578,0.001729051,0.001154722,0.002021626,0.001936433,0.001493034,0.0009382322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02117559,0.000415916,0.0005535888,0.002150403,0.003519898,0.002495671,0.001541523,0.0009993707,0.0002742781],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00332089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00198453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1002892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1543538,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984404,0.0006935647,0.0001006146,0.0003127808,0.0003625425,0.00009012684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963151,0.001852266,0.0004143402,0.0005179608,0.0007176957,0.0001826066],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001238124,0.0002238395,0.4730675,0.001963919,0.002055132,0.002975123,0.004230585,0.05572516,0.02371139,0.1078796,0.009230019,0.3176998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001549897,0.0003719193,0.3869089,0.0006538664,0.000551688,0.002393995,0.002861104,0.2986066,0.009511384,0.2840151,0.0135464,0.0004240078],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8338634,0.01917424,0.1032023,0.0256598,0.0007738014,0.0001382151,0.0007730187,0.0006265672,0.01578869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820256,0.002291024,0.0122221,0.002130276,0.0001802913,0.00002964619,0.00007654793,0.00004842712,0.000996076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1002892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1994109,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02514921324832316,"score_gpt":0.2174338660702776,"score_spread":0.1922846528219544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}