{"id":"W2052022446","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.589","title":"Comparison of expert-rater methods for assessing psychosocial job strain","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health","topic":"Workplace Health and Well-being","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Work & Health; Providence Health Care","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Psychosocial; Inter-rater reliability; Job strain; Reliability (semiconductor); Concurrent validity; Job control; Psychology; Validity; Applied psychology; Work (physics); Clinical psychology; Engineering; Psychometrics; Psychiatry; Developmental psychology; Rating scale","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00578759,0.0002861056,0.001156201,0.0002357917,0.001182752,0.00002104247,0.0003114726,0.0002726989,0.0007293365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001070104,0.0002468056,0.0002626957,0.000283994,0.0001220466,0.0002351358,0.00004835234,0.001166498,0.00002032068],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008432809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005570913,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003856037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007455199,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935372,0.002074731,0.002485808,0.0002956182,0.0004563399,0.001150263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952868,0.0009553678,0.002644937,0.000305858,0.00007320765,0.000733868],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007388394,0.0003050114,0.7593587,0.00036873,0.00005748415,0.000004607477,0.009924407,0.0001013952,0.0004036137,0.0001696491,0.01643324,0.2121343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009165947,0.002838869,0.6470641,0.007535564,0.0001188558,0.00003942175,0.02397482,0.0002063581,0.0001898657,0.005592959,0.3024466,0.0008266412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4834624,0.0155205,0.4419402,0.04666666,0.006051456,0.003562237,0.00003492368,0.0000558789,0.002705743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.827898,0.002772993,0.1637313,0.002947646,0.001931363,0.00006202384,0.00001720174,0.00008693449,0.0005525376],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3444356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999984,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09660843477732747,"score_gpt":0.5198565827475535,"score_spread":0.423248147970226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}