{"id":"W2052191475","doi":"10.5558/tfc85440-3","title":"The “emulation of natural disturbance” (END) management approach in Canadian forestry: A critical evaluation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of British Columbia; McGill University","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Emulation; Environmental resource management; Forest management; Adaptive management; Natural (archaeology); Climate change; Naturalism; Biodiversity; Forester; Forestry; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007151406,0.0001052172,0.00008198267,0.00003621769,0.0002437276,0.00004333666,0.0004193138,0.00003827654,0.0002358502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004233856,0.00006842508,0.00004457379,0.0003316767,0.0002698896,0.0001754738,0.00007628268,0.0001355415,0.00008358758],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005153634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003712304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03292766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04718183,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986771,0.00007757768,0.0002026539,0.0001822079,0.0004080648,0.0004524096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994396,0.00005076986,0.00005012912,0.0003810362,0.000007759825,0.00007068137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002073721,0.0003527055,0.173853,0.00008213025,0.00006024347,0.00001431642,0.001933195,0.1364733,0.0001019158,0.4293776,0.03181512,0.2257292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003390175,0.00004095166,0.7547866,0.00001093054,0.00002143155,0.000001551106,0.00004831209,0.2267295,0.00001551979,0.01337459,0.004540441,0.00009122529],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9030735,0.0003807919,0.00003019978,0.003544282,0.0001342581,0.0008088051,0.000003911848,0.0000187798,0.09200542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989914,0.00001680023,0.0001153892,0.0001685954,0.00005075064,0.00003479423,0.00001842656,0.000006623181,0.0005972118],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5809336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9735122,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01281452179160721,"score_gpt":0.2701408795602225,"score_spread":0.2573263577686153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}