{"id":"W2052191475","doi":"10.5558/tfc85440-3","title":"The “emulation of natural disturbance” (END) management approach in Canadian forestry: A critical evaluation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of British Columbia; McGill University","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Emulation; Environmental resource management; Forest management; Adaptive management; Natural (archaeology); Climate change; Naturalism; Biodiversity; Forester; Forestry; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1335903,0.0009171195,0.000626799,0.003489123,0.02035731,0.009927758,0.003946891,0.003552735,0.001887216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07739626,0.0003252311,0.000631774,0.003908602,0.03268516,0.005381272,0.005782924,0.004588372,0.00006371487],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2382685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2086884,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8342504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9117431,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9206963,0.05277504,0.001918841,0.001515452,0.01736526,0.005729099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8878239,0.06918217,0.003120409,0.001827361,0.03576502,0.002281057],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003851083,0.0003253113,0.01288335,0.001903339,0.0001035363,0.000326224,0.05274727,0.002918069,0.0004930879,0.7845074,0.02133405,0.1220733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004169631,0.001836121,0.07847511,0.00916232,0.0008520075,0.0004847307,0.3123048,0.01161624,0.0038206,0.1178396,0.4627215,0.0004700277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3515924,0.04071878,0.01970513,0.2330497,0.001626151,0.006932999,0.0003973018,0.00005685531,0.3459206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9626368,0.007315058,0.01075217,0.01217262,0.0001957548,0.001193805,0.00004746456,0.00001943225,0.005666826],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7617314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8835005,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01281452179160721,"score_gpt":0.2701408795602225,"score_spread":0.2573263577686153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}