{"id":"W2052372972","doi":"10.1177/0191453706063206","title":"Equal consideration of all – an aporetic project?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":212,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Democracy; Sociology; Politics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0200037,0.0005987801,0.0009405767,0.001335149,0.007615892,0.01039827,0.002209709,0.006852677,0.00457883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02941224,0.0003825938,0.0007770801,0.0008636453,0.07784231,0.02563066,0.01402058,0.01077871,0.0007206426],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005625374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006613109,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001813201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001358789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9735245,0.01571349,0.0006774872,0.003066478,0.004370102,0.00264796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836816,0.008469268,0.001331401,0.003227816,0.001729165,0.001560757],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007844803,0.000006399397,0.00006272423,0.00001297298,0.000004661075,0.00001971597,0.001921293,0.00003919066,0.00004365635,0.9947779,0.0006391145,0.002464466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005645539,0.000009080146,0.00006373822,0.00002777322,0.000004109584,0.00004026223,0.001291378,0.0001041211,0.0001318455,0.9791589,0.01915729,0.000005797122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05520732,0.004516781,0.122557,0.2376889,0.001872793,0.0001221441,0.00004243293,0.0001661777,0.5778264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9687948,0.0005655902,0.005995892,0.01123229,0.0005710023,0.00009482197,0.00001586526,0.00008619711,0.01264355],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0200037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105791,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1394296857028716,"score_gpt":0.4071279646428375,"score_spread":0.2676982789399659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}