{"id":"W2052470044","doi":"10.1002/1521-4001(200109)81:9<642::aid-zamm642>3.0.co;2-y","title":"Plastic Deformation at the Tip of an Edge Crack","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ZAMM ‐ Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics / Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik","topic":"Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Materials science; Deformation (meteorology); Geometry; Crack tip opening displacement; Composite material; Space (punctuation); Crack closure; Fracture mechanics; Mathematics; Engineering; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004497843,0.0004548229,0.0004990424,0.0004419292,0.0005004072,0.001056389,0.0005857454,0.002511661,0.004314651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001812696,0.000367978,0.0004223257,0.0002328884,0.001134201,0.001047442,0.001281136,0.0009982089,0.0004754275],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004298991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006073125,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001158423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008717955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998425,0.00002586612,0.000006083033,0.00004531185,0.00005014785,0.00003005262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997009,0.0001332414,0.00004086838,0.00002601442,0.00006098967,0.00003802188],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002586594,0.00009862157,0.0019498,0.0002767915,0.00003180568,0.001585518,0.0003434812,0.7532805,0.05098549,0.1594434,0.001970693,0.02977525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003518149,0.00006341933,0.0009715718,0.00003620213,0.00001038783,0.000337755,0.0001137731,0.96852,0.004776062,0.02331165,0.001791598,0.00003233658],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3747654,0.0008090236,0.578245,0.001129731,0.0002584425,0.0001491941,0.0002173359,0.0003023353,0.04412356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93642,0.0004477813,0.03787616,0.0001804783,0.00007040427,0.00008539578,0.0001398485,0.000092231,0.02468761],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004314651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01443398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009689574706810783,"score_gpt":0.220814739101327,"score_spread":0.2111251643945163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}