{"id":"W2052576792","doi":"10.1037/a0036838","title":"An eye for the I: Preferential attention to the eyes of ingroup members.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Outgroup; Ingroups and outgroups; Psychology; Gaze; Social psychology; Perception; Social perception; In-group favoritism; Eye tracking; Face perception; Developmental psychology; Individuation; Social group; Social identity theory","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003024592,0.00008013783,0.0002476218,0.00004424082,0.0007767635,0.000040917,0.0004091164,0.0001710084,0.000119447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021423,0.00004962935,0.0002041603,0.0001184734,0.000622734,0.0001229257,0.00001786395,0.000210442,0.000001759861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002210961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003827279,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004214901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001619464,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983135,0.000748902,0.0003444462,0.0001338825,0.0002466191,0.000212622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989235,0.000313196,0.0003399828,0.00009190562,0.0002632492,0.0000681588],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003076282,0.0009408504,0.02799104,0.00005884709,0.0006919876,9.040337e-7,0.3634011,0.000006657562,0.00866235,0.4059273,0.05494183,0.1343008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001302101,0.001447808,0.5848776,0.00001539457,0.0001613439,0.000004928781,0.03169176,0.0000214253,0.00001343947,0.02445709,0.3558497,0.0001574416],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9241923,0.0001109049,0.005487738,0.06445782,0.002034176,0.0002127885,0.00000985415,0.000006654892,0.003487785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993527,0.00005771432,0.0001273953,0.003135368,0.002998753,0.000007519502,0.000001183057,0.000006080085,0.00013901],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5568865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5974315,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06930593724348899,"score_gpt":0.4332799859692494,"score_spread":0.3639740487257604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}