{"id":"W2052623365","doi":"10.1007/s10346-003-0002-0","title":"Recognition of debris flow, debris flood and flood hazard through watershed morphometrics","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Landslides","topic":"Landslides and related hazards","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":332,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Forests; University of British Columbia Hospital; Government of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Debris flow; Debris; Watershed; Flood myth; Alluvial fan; Hydrology (agriculture); Landslide; Terrain; Flooding (psychology); Hazard analysis; Natural hazard; Geology; Environmental science; Geography; Geomorphology; Cartography; Geotechnical engineering; Archaeology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002075894,0.0001996044,0.0002862428,0.00007548353,0.0001314679,0.00004336322,0.0001568258,0.0001782729,0.0006791462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007075901,0.0001431143,0.00009129754,0.0005002012,0.0001480633,0.0003051804,0.0001471206,0.0001616325,0.000218812],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007083583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001214772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009252455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002159667,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986143,0.00003218529,0.0003229979,0.0003503766,0.0003268267,0.0003532835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994886,0.00004673988,0.0001029615,0.0002288709,0.00001988716,0.0001129211],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007111048,0.001510901,0.7039085,0.0003898368,0.0007359197,0.0003539316,0.01233349,0.01345909,0.04347032,0.0001783799,0.01003771,0.2129108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02132915,0.002401473,0.3463438,0.0006747248,0.00113246,0.0008199593,0.001801048,0.003365769,0.527334,0.05054757,0.04108,0.003170017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928634,0.0003798221,0.001553569,0.0003103534,0.000152403,0.0001782751,0.00004193545,0.00006322072,0.004457013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813787,0.00105207,0.01708131,0.0001770539,0.0000567521,0.00001009642,0.00006037934,0.0000252455,0.0001584012],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4838637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7436175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0141946277127149,"score_gpt":0.2139507886920002,"score_spread":0.1997561609792853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}