{"id":"W2052788430","doi":"10.4236/ns.2010.210140","title":"The Rich-Gini-Simpson quadratic index of biodiversity","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Science","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Quadratic equation; Diversity index; Mathematics; Gini coefficient; Measure (data warehouse); Statistics; Diversity (politics); Biodiversity; Biogeography; Inequality; Econometrics; Ecology; Biology; Species richness; Computer science; Sociology; Economic inequality; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005563369,0.00005092448,0.00005371961,0.0000198768,0.0008608025,0.00001877761,0.000485379,0.00003268379,0.0001118952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002871059,0.00003079636,0.00001962032,0.0004584648,0.002491673,0.0002267143,0.0002547563,0.0002107307,0.0001350476],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000349609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002319706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001257728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029582,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992737,0.00001455325,0.00008617766,0.0001581581,0.0002766496,0.0001908146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995991,0.000125886,0.00006938781,0.0001441256,0.00002367598,0.00003783279],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000647515,0.00001908737,0.9694389,0.000001210146,0.000002652738,6.482537e-7,0.0003680304,0.00008752809,0.02343485,0.002040083,0.0005870306,0.004013486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006526238,0.00001735598,0.9915462,6.234231e-7,0.000002581115,0.000001643541,0.0001006299,0.005284968,0.001035739,0.001193918,0.0006994586,0.00005163251],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926818,0.00002293876,0.00001731526,0.0009566061,0.0005899184,0.00006610659,0.000001089418,0.00001116378,0.005653048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993643,0.000008685825,0.0002187385,0.0001222157,0.000006554213,0.000001317865,2.250761e-7,6.297196e-7,0.0002773192],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02239911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9180675,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.003801357589431512,"score_gpt":0.2225684664591089,"score_spread":0.2187671088696774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}