{"id":"W2052788430","doi":"10.4236/ns.2010.210140","title":"The Rich-Gini-Simpson quadratic index of biodiversity","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Science","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Quadratic equation; Diversity index; Mathematics; Gini coefficient; Measure (data warehouse); Statistics; Diversity (politics); Biodiversity; Biogeography; Inequality; Econometrics; Ecology; Biology; Species richness; Computer science; Sociology; Economic inequality; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002197454,0.0004760013,0.0006798983,0.003117668,0.0006545918,0.001821121,0.0006885533,0.0004724555,0.0029893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009448612,0.0001684785,0.0004614086,0.003565776,0.0009432656,0.00228671,0.001659261,0.0009016649,0.0008966429],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001130316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008106152,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00260539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002301859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983747,0.0003312356,0.0001143823,0.0002766321,0.0007891984,0.0001138176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973698,0.0009500177,0.0004081349,0.0002484124,0.0008013016,0.0002222309],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002412697,0.00009040484,0.1149837,0.0006404604,0.0005688914,0.0004336848,0.001053969,0.04720228,0.009337281,0.3489193,0.04282312,0.4337056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002761072,0.000264301,0.1588832,0.000235609,0.0001610842,0.002424614,0.0009558139,0.1661517,0.005982777,0.5203468,0.1442819,0.0002846096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1479261,0.007279372,0.7526435,0.001258765,0.0007665564,0.0002969356,0.006309229,0.0009702039,0.08254941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8450543,0.002566446,0.1363624,0.0002858574,0.0004478871,0.0002930144,0.003622095,0.0002778484,0.01109019],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003117668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01162142,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.003801357589431512,"score_gpt":0.2225684664591089,"score_spread":0.2187671088696774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}