{"id":"W2052794562","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-6592.2002.tb00772.x","title":"Efficacy of Annual Bacteria Monitoring and Shock Chlorination in Wells Finished in a Floodplain Aquifer","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation","topic":"Groundwater flow and contamination studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Health Services; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Aquifer; Water well; Groundwater; Contamination; Water quality; Floodplain; Hydrology (agriculture); Effluent; Fecal coliform; Shock (circulatory); Environmental engineering; Septic shock; Coliform bacteria; Bacteria; Geology; Ecology; Biology; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003931464,0.0001858315,0.0002341737,0.0001949901,0.00007224771,0.00005015316,0.0001296577,0.00009967176,0.00009133112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005227245,0.0001853584,0.00003185871,0.0003092929,0.0000651572,0.0007783,0.0001327072,0.0001410567,0.00006102609],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002991696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002755233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005991394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007884575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983746,0.00008737317,0.0004813266,0.0003616852,0.0003790653,0.0003159566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995418,0.00009763554,0.0001175352,0.0001655938,0.00002256875,0.00005485998],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003150747,0.0001331402,0.9476548,0.00002020502,0.000007178529,0.000006032039,0.008128675,0.000133617,0.01659576,0.000005169643,0.0000148776,0.02726906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001208575,0.00007668409,0.9715936,0.00006635126,0.000008052309,0.00000170281,0.0004652276,0.000216758,0.02542096,0.00001935669,0.0007443174,0.0001784583],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983923,0.00007795038,0.0001681269,0.0001428782,0.000792216,0.0002617131,0.000001952905,0.00002898928,0.00013384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985969,0.0001258319,0.000380586,0.000005635445,0.0002488426,0.00005957001,0.000005457533,0.00001655563,0.0005606049],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0270906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7558695,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01563297323805746,"score_gpt":0.2245056708102595,"score_spread":0.2088726975722021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}