{"id":"W2052796888","doi":"10.3821/1913-701x(2008)141[28:afoofa]2.0.co;2","title":"“All for one, one for all”: Evaluating composite endpoints in clinical trials","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Clinical trial; Medicine; Psychology; Medical physics; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.439517,0.005941125,0.02674712,0.004333758,0.002667655,0.006988183,0.003810734,0.01053082,0.005270768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6339786,0.003182399,0.015514,0.007832328,0.009406167,0.01358483,0.006068985,0.01432318,0.0006834506],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003338484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009142464,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008054175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002127803,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1833444,0.7836654,0.01821053,0.005559693,0.008458336,0.0007616166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1925484,0.7515378,0.02358147,0.0233021,0.005799159,0.003231117],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.08240321,0.001132886,0.01683134,0.04658684,0.1313208,0.000542396,0.001784242,0.01566045,0.0006697218,0.04588468,0.03088149,0.626302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07199001,0.03344721,0.01977403,0.0245589,0.1306972,0.00238602,0.001168163,0.1112374,0.002737177,0.5663437,0.03418956,0.001470618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.101499,0.2757508,0.4673635,0.09995753,0.02502226,0.01617028,0.002355672,0.002006862,0.009874185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4541378,0.02273939,0.4551835,0.04117762,0.008400404,0.01603677,0.0007956316,0.0005341822,0.0009946657],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.560483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6911753,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8171428711561579,"score_gpt":0.558376567829936,"score_spread":0.2587663033262219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}