{"id":"W2052921691","doi":"10.1039/b307973b","title":"Comparison of mass bias correction models for the examination of isotopic composition of mercury using sector field ICP-MS","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Isotope; Natural abundance; Thallium; Chemistry; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Power law; Exponential function; Atomic mass; Mercury (programming language); Mass spectrometry; Statistics; Mathematics; Physics; Atomic physics; Nuclear physics; Environmental chemistry; Chromatography; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00918728,0.001147939,0.0005994459,0.001702064,0.0003707211,0.0008297038,0.00134182,0.0007331626,0.0006969832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01609705,0.0005836591,0.001188847,0.001337321,0.0003146695,0.001085115,0.0004425297,0.0005879911,0.000490068],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001760641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001699749,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008323966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01493995,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969745,0.0008231748,0.0001880265,0.0003783772,0.001514121,0.0001218005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948573,0.003214626,0.0003144764,0.0004443045,0.001132067,0.00003706503],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003081849,0.0004638665,0.1119354,0.001144324,0.00109955,0.000272393,0.0007959913,0.2428711,0.1931397,0.01197118,0.003753746,0.4294709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001555388,0.0008722717,0.02262778,0.00008673167,0.0004084497,0.0005480821,0.0001997717,0.848021,0.1147287,0.006089247,0.006085941,0.0001765167],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2591441,0.0008726895,0.7344415,0.0002484392,0.00008314347,0.0003056563,0.0005178355,0.002152225,0.002234427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6978632,0.0008782656,0.297249,0.0001046382,0.00001297881,0.0004364378,0.0009504855,0.0004755433,0.002029473],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00918728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04858756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06882412929703297,"score_gpt":0.3305575164292355,"score_spread":0.2617333871322025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}