{"id":"W2053041999","doi":"10.1177/002199830003400401","title":"Dynamic Testing of Composite Laminates with a Tensile Split Hopkinson Bar","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Composite Materials","topic":"High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Split-Hopkinson pressure bar; Composite material; Ultimate tensile strength; Epoxy; Strain rate; Tensile testing; Bar (unit); Dynamic testing; Composite number; Composite laminates; Dynamic loading; Structural engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004301194,0.0004386322,0.0002567583,0.0005822198,0.0002954009,0.0002030386,0.0004170336,0.0002521314,0.002507052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005494755,0.0003107453,0.000158489,0.0002607897,0.0002985041,0.0003626195,0.0003466782,0.0003054008,0.0002911548],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002046388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001276708,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003359978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009890472,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995838,0.00003979874,0.0000188523,0.00007205981,0.0002445989,0.00004086016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992051,0.0002546051,0.0001140403,0.0001143034,0.0002189899,0.00009319015],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005748357,0.00001656993,0.0003980335,0.00003307236,0.000004031364,0.00004575469,0.00003499399,0.0001636808,0.9942166,0.00005195575,0.00002971247,0.004948202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007699326,0.0008258919,0.01171999,0.000008817182,0.00001281815,0.0003766065,0.0000459919,0.002489235,0.9834456,0.00004816234,0.001005114,0.00001411724],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9666171,0.0005310204,0.02980236,0.00003101529,0.00006263678,0.00005922452,0.0001588394,0.0003922179,0.002345495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982042,0.0002786197,0.01530114,0.00002162871,0.00001501925,0.00006818162,0.0001448892,0.00004394083,0.002084581],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002507052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00838697,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01267672023493682,"score_gpt":0.253855651279483,"score_spread":0.2411789310445461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}