{"id":"W2053041999","doi":"10.1177/002199830003400401","title":"Dynamic Testing of Composite Laminates with a Tensile Split Hopkinson Bar","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Composite Materials","topic":"High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Split-Hopkinson pressure bar; Composite material; Ultimate tensile strength; Epoxy; Strain rate; Tensile testing; Bar (unit); Dynamic testing; Composite number; Composite laminates; Dynamic loading; Structural engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008496023,0.0003374113,0.001028028,0.0002009086,0.0001499209,0.0003048341,0.0004996018,0.0001206643,0.002397585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003931503,0.0002453374,0.0001006946,0.0002221771,0.0001964314,0.0005036832,0.00006762888,0.0001223206,0.0001517082],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008448588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001090213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001590254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003734757,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972814,0.0002360941,0.001225214,0.0002286254,0.0005686997,0.000459915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979337,0.0001448506,0.0009677202,0.0003135672,0.0004719506,0.0001682075],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001035865,0.0001745782,0.0007705367,0.0001075261,0.00003013871,0.0001232155,0.0003360534,0.0001841921,0.996341,0.0000181576,0.00007655993,0.0008021328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001171665,0.0009449026,0.03425632,0.000598698,0.0001731616,0.0006522211,0.00003313698,0.00002125991,0.9610624,0.00004368544,0.0007463948,0.0002961175],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984432,0.00008514462,0.00004647225,0.0001223933,0.0005655361,0.0002360402,0.0001634504,0.00005320712,0.0002845769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792086,0.00003741222,0.02032921,0.00007188777,0.0001485709,0.000003856458,0.00001156294,0.00004664739,0.000142172],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0352786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01267672023493682,"score_gpt":0.253855651279483,"score_spread":0.2411789310445461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}