{"id":"W2053104456","doi":"10.1086/603629","title":"Bumblebees Learn to Forage like Bayesians","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Naturalist","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Foraging; Forage; Optimal foraging theory; Generalist and specialist species; Set (abstract data type); Ecology; Bayesian probability; Prior probability; Selection (genetic algorithm); Variance (accounting); Computer science; Machine learning; Biology; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001023682,0.0001156699,0.000172167,0.000006139019,0.0003395662,0.00006329444,0.0003571561,0.0000157017,0.0000622645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000329127,0.00003181682,0.0000735606,0.000436941,0.00009991437,0.00004438466,0.0000534101,0.0001195963,0.0001705859],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001459156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001892758,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001093489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002605917,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992319,0.00004080002,0.0000945468,0.0001846296,0.0001447713,0.0003033006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996886,0.0001154803,0.00006113422,0.00003375393,0.00002545521,0.00007559777],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002804017,0.00007907516,0.005625676,0.000001608262,0.00003228663,0.00002566011,0.0004067075,0.000005153876,0.4257267,0.001290999,0.1115114,0.4550144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003677355,0.0003900362,0.8115845,0.000007286325,0.000009091648,0.000009154694,0.000553199,0.000009758758,0.0004956208,0.0003674773,0.1863524,0.0001846419],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9640909,0.00017434,0.000001274477,0.03160692,0.00003384084,0.0001060111,0.0000272517,0.00008940257,0.003869999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876316,0.0000733874,0.00005676056,0.009944063,0.0002527401,0.000003393693,0.00000826773,5.086352e-7,0.002029277],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8059589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2611703,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01986392941282891,"score_gpt":0.2290084243199945,"score_spread":0.2091444949071656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}