{"id":"W2053104456","doi":"10.1086/603629","title":"Bumblebees Learn to Forage like Bayesians","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Naturalist","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Foraging; Forage; Optimal foraging theory; Generalist and specialist species; Set (abstract data type); Ecology; Bayesian probability; Prior probability; Selection (genetic algorithm); Variance (accounting); Computer science; Machine learning; Biology; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001038357,0.0002117791,0.0002970601,0.000292458,0.0002795559,0.0007014621,0.0002974952,0.0004684705,0.001650492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005591282,0.0002948812,0.0002918493,0.0001605299,0.0004556789,0.0008622486,0.0003552957,0.0005361126,0.0002541743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004100573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001429373,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005394449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008008746,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998109,0.0000622158,0.000009062247,0.00005611319,0.00003460243,0.00002718886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987997,0.0004958197,0.0003285119,0.000236312,0.00007144574,0.00006822311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009435954,0.000645448,0.4482739,0.0002877854,0.0005536227,0.0004595943,0.003636247,0.1587379,0.09438054,0.05351921,0.004661265,0.233901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001188038,0.0008599676,0.378018,0.00004905549,0.0001281781,0.0005830931,0.0005762786,0.5475711,0.005479889,0.06099974,0.005494023,0.000121981],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764283,0.0000521926,0.02200471,0.0001750194,0.000004201414,0.00001327574,0.00004078565,0.00006627523,0.001215289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868819,0.00008446158,0.01112774,0.0001082995,0.00001127067,0.00002235598,0.0001122311,0.00001714152,0.001634727],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005394449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01072609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01986392941282891,"score_gpt":0.2290084243199945,"score_spread":0.2091444949071656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}