{"id":"W2053127673","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.09.003","title":"Revisiting the model of creative destruction: St. Jacobs, Ontario, a decade later","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Rural Studies","topic":"Rural development and sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; Transformative learning; Sociology; Consumption (sociology); Ideology; Creative industries; Creative destruction; State (computer science); Investment (military); Environmental ethics; Economic geography; Aesthetics; Economy; Political science; Social science; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003263696,0.00009597909,0.0002702073,0.000008623881,0.0003513909,0.00001113073,0.0001541549,0.00003096481,0.00007094989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001228629,0.0000253036,0.0001395467,0.0001294801,0.0001692568,0.0001835432,0.00006803594,0.0001548119,7.177474e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001115036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003148182,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005841573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007868208,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991149,0.00005862651,0.0003880796,0.00005714443,0.0002380588,0.0001432441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990295,0.0001454017,0.0003039828,0.00002443314,0.0004625973,0.00003408698],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003117651,0.00005676434,0.905039,0.00003701383,0.0004770849,0.00002957981,0.01599346,0.0003569534,0.01218276,0.0002778864,0.007201739,0.05803604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001640591,0.0001701654,0.9738081,0.00008076277,0.0000353618,0.00009997824,0.01774598,0.00002685589,0.001047917,0.00475687,0.001952701,0.0001113113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942211,0.001212419,0.000002044036,0.004193089,0.00007240455,0.00006885458,0.000002378386,0.000004192226,0.0002234983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976355,0.0008294522,0.0002451971,0.0000518166,0.0001962291,0.000001597196,8.311945e-7,3.962566e-7,0.001038941],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06876907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.270265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04715996146723046,"score_gpt":0.2569496220330094,"score_spread":0.2097896605657789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}