{"id":"W2053241591","doi":"10.1111/0272-4332.216168","title":"A Framework to Guide Thinking and Analysis Regarding Climate Change Policies","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Risk Analysis","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Carnegie Mellon University","keywords":"Climate change; Policy analysis; Constraint (computer-aided design); Political economy of climate change; Term (time); Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Management science; Environmental economics; Economics; Political science; Business; Environmental science; Engineering; Public administration","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001145464,0.0002503786,0.001068173,0.002666285,0.0004261331,0.0003054709,0.0002896037,0.0001623068,0.0005359748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002678876,0.0002908456,0.00064526,0.004288856,0.00004157705,0.0002814177,0.0002467862,0.000186034,0.0003956074],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001579301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003120619,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009441585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030247,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978167,0.00002751501,0.0007929332,0.0006739901,0.00004909092,0.0006397608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984288,0.0001553174,0.0004931018,0.0006595167,0.00003117339,0.0002320479],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001240464,0.00002136091,0.9359141,0.000008401422,0.002807441,0.000003667165,0.004933775,0.001181418,4.607668e-7,0.05402223,0.0000901731,0.001004538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003661569,0.00005402049,0.8205513,0.00003206578,0.006205924,0.000005037973,0.001714824,0.06673884,0.00000866698,0.06410171,0.0391125,0.001108944],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9527272,0.002615123,0.02692672,0.003085147,0.0001209823,0.000188779,0.0008416452,0.0001044306,0.01338999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692626,0.02203893,0.005857861,0.002031902,0.0003876797,0.00005376914,0.00005507916,0.00003302481,0.0002791825],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1153628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999543,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0883017552666899,"score_gpt":0.3022509808609248,"score_spread":0.2139492255942349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}