{"id":"W2053279737","doi":"10.1177/1468794110394068","title":"Communication technologies for focus groups with remote communities: a case study of research with First Nations in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Participatory action research; Qualitative research; Citizen journalism; Videoconferencing; Public relations; Information and Communications Technology; Community-based participatory research; Sociology; Political science; Multimedia; Computer science; Social science; World Wide Web","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036414,0.000140577,0.0003510258,0.001080141,0.002839693,0.00004782519,0.0009128005,0.00008432964,0.00002899184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006187272,0.0001087203,0.00002099799,0.004079661,0.00349213,0.0002563364,0.0002274358,0.0009482064,0.000001155911],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001120684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002696118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9748918,0.02204569,0.0004470975,0.0002807702,0.001592135,0.0007424669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9481035,0.04770751,0.0001435094,0.0007263033,0.003231985,0.00008721074],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003488682,0.0004596167,0.002728506,0.0001113451,0.00005947438,0.00007365114,0.8874434,0.000004712708,0.000002012286,0.1061689,0.00009425903,0.002505273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001027002,0.002687622,0.000490778,0.0002820416,0.000005724622,0.000005923831,0.9698704,0.00006044822,0.00007384265,0.02487569,0.0004744577,0.0001461034],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791074,0.0003512565,0.002028149,0.001794348,0.00001267561,0.003136996,0.00004987314,0.00004257699,0.01347674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710574,0.0001386726,0.02791151,0.000002853565,0.000007451845,0.0006807255,0.000004433758,0.0000232769,0.0001737221],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08242693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6043639673826666,"score_gpt":0.600795378554305,"score_spread":0.003568588828361641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}