{"id":"W2053283959","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12248","title":"A test of the umbrella species approach in restored floodplain ponds","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of the Pacific","keywords":"Species richness; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Biology; Biomass (ecology); Invertebrate; Benthic zone; Floodplain","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007677111,0.00008220381,0.000261332,0.00006181406,0.0000762849,0.000003287457,0.0003524579,0.0000801591,0.0002988449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001207192,0.00005601111,0.00005245335,0.000185384,0.0003431214,0.00003726418,0.0002721772,0.0002050765,0.00002590959],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008521746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008526706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004564223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000856431,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991681,0.00005256877,0.0003487946,0.0001124292,0.0001318452,0.0001862543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992707,0.0002310196,0.0003256054,0.0001412322,0.000006750791,0.00002470043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008814118,0.0004051065,0.9431823,0.00001787826,0.00003644824,0.000004015269,0.0005850188,0.004459362,0.003601533,0.004111437,0.04326696,0.0002417273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006246616,0.0001538143,0.9896047,0.000003084829,0.00001998102,0.000009728097,0.0002848664,0.0001565281,0.0002950589,0.00281303,0.00597803,0.00005652491],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7699065,0.000003216656,0.00004665127,0.0009397998,0.0001528735,0.0001158306,5.044951e-7,0.000002647666,0.228832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979935,0.00002132898,0.0007288555,0.000628151,0.00004386449,0.000006414986,2.090995e-7,0.000005017911,0.000572669],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2282593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3272142,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00786646012809686,"score_gpt":0.1888119002671681,"score_spread":0.1809454401390713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}