{"id":"W2053287998","doi":"10.1109/cseet.2013.6595236","title":"Understanding individual contribution and collaboration in student software teams","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Team software process; Computer science; Process (computing); Visualization; Personal software process; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Software development; Collaborative software; Software; Work (physics); Knowledge management; Teamwork; Software development process; Software engineering; Engineering; Software construction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01168241,0.0003890186,0.0004642529,0.002875172,0.004110195,0.007375116,0.001386395,0.001281591,0.001738752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03614003,0.0003569065,0.0003160441,0.001225365,0.004245359,0.005987563,0.007125405,0.001536602,0.0002931984],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001796909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002350158,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002312079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002464488,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9885818,0.008126315,0.0003961895,0.0008454896,0.001381643,0.000668507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9679192,0.02322039,0.003045097,0.001376539,0.002153229,0.00228563],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005766319,0.0002272114,0.07170346,0.000101795,0.00002901582,0.00026139,0.8963956,0.0005179324,0.0007797746,0.004919199,0.0003345224,0.02467241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002800017,0.0002152484,0.04871238,0.000199804,0.00004751018,0.0002827003,0.9132066,0.005482461,0.001224195,0.02190764,0.008652239,0.00004121273],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908248,0.00008958058,0.003985565,0.0003693334,0.000009560466,0.00002563945,0.000007826172,0.00001693002,0.004670713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984828,0.0000820081,0.0009110434,0.00003342731,0.000004294123,0.00002476736,0.000009157764,0.000007014433,0.000445571],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01168241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06178319,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03364517926474721,"score_gpt":0.2947431571742883,"score_spread":0.2610979779095411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}