{"id":"W2053295808","doi":"10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.05.006","title":"A short‐term longitudinal analysis of friendship selection on early adolescent substance use","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Adolescence","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Research Unit on Children's Psychosocial Maladjustment; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse","keywords":"Friendship; Psychology; Term (time); Substance use; Selection (genetic algorithm); Longitudinal study; Developmental psychology; Adolescent development; Social psychology; Clinical psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001754568,0.0001826304,0.0002172215,0.0007275982,0.0008219042,0.0004280091,0.0003377372,0.0003150195,0.0009940384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003778234,0.0001949192,0.0003993244,0.000751316,0.0002390984,0.000414876,0.0004985031,0.0004719918,0.0001739514],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001044716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001216635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1872004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.262583,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999498,0.0001906234,0.00002175944,0.00005409078,0.00009186763,0.0001436036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975716,0.0004986139,0.0006237421,0.0002516781,0.0005037118,0.0005506148],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007889067,0.0000623421,0.9958917,0.000003887236,0.00004172283,0.00002558117,0.0004104025,0.00004471547,0.0001707795,0.00003525955,0.0001107459,0.003124015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001277889,0.00004944834,0.9993833,0.000003163068,0.00001471414,0.00001805914,0.0002157651,0.0001358635,0.00003514306,0.000008923364,0.0001324773,0.000001851244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995229,0.00008426238,0.00006068358,0.000025528,0.000002023342,0.000004984852,0.0001713123,0.000001561619,0.0001267601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992332,0.00007241496,0.0001005935,0.000007756897,0.000002548299,0.00001297461,0.0003230455,9.390337e-7,0.0002466128],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1872004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3722215,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09119246221368808,"score_gpt":0.3931575636311691,"score_spread":0.301965101417481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}