{"id":"W2053310036","doi":"10.1890/10-1345.1","title":"A novel statistical method for classifying habitat generalists and specialists","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":272,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Office of International Science and Engineering; Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; Division of Environmental Biology; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Generalist and specialist species; Abundance (ecology); Multinomial distribution; Habitat; Ecology; Geography; Relative species abundance; Sampling (signal processing); Statistics; Biology; Mathematics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002421459,0.00007736413,0.0001377394,0.0000192035,0.0001728648,0.000004626032,0.00006530531,0.00008038933,0.0008133549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001471971,0.0000731226,0.00001878843,0.00003513124,0.0002588104,0.00005068512,0.0001056649,0.00005837932,0.00006482669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005047759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000064038,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000627972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009840515,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993457,0.00004577071,0.0001333373,0.0002301263,0.00003514699,0.0002099332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994968,0.0003325493,0.00004730497,0.00006597454,0.000007590797,0.00004979602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006456209,0.0001598774,0.8493575,0.00001643371,0.00004940807,0.00001075267,0.001589102,0.00005327775,0.002299844,0.1378752,0.005448805,0.003075222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004013986,0.0001263747,0.9752111,6.007104e-7,0.00001853458,0.00001907004,0.00003777554,0.005949381,0.00004189215,0.01640406,0.001695621,0.00009417758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.3573109,0.00002600339,0.615656,0.0008133763,0.0006931548,0.0004470444,0.00005360179,0.00004466415,0.02495528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4617302,0.000007344844,0.5365404,0.0009009487,0.00004337674,0.00008279086,0.000008117088,0.000008660916,0.0006782056],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1258536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8905666,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04624835809622719,"score_gpt":0.3012962345805454,"score_spread":0.2550478764843183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}