{"id":"W2053342679","doi":"10.1007/s10933-009-9383-y","title":"Epiphytic diatoms as flood indicators","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Paleolimnology","topic":"Geology and Paleoclimatology Research","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Diatom; Macrophyte; Epiphyte; Flood myth; Floodplain; Substrate (aquarium); Ecology; Sedimentology; Environmental science; Relative species abundance; Hydrology (agriculture); Paleolimnology; Abundance (ecology); Physical geography; Geography; Geology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005864924,0.0001285235,0.0003754951,0.000539511,0.0001192687,0.00001340374,0.0004480917,0.0002715975,0.002526086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002727621,0.0000971004,0.0001263061,0.0003395961,0.0002741361,0.000143073,0.000007685248,0.0006695744,0.0009656164],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001387252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001631274,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001030352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001814919,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984497,0.0002588744,0.0004350451,0.0001497419,0.0002249266,0.0004817149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989486,0.0002966963,0.0002912651,0.0001643015,0.0000772444,0.0002218301],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001109998,0.00003644489,0.9896103,0.000004087092,0.00004660478,0.0005734839,0.0001308689,0.00006269908,0.00001236645,0.0004671891,0.0002225714,0.008722349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006002806,0.001373615,0.9811186,0.000008959781,0.00002919498,0.00313197,0.00007808896,0.0000439267,0.0001194825,0.01189363,0.001502948,0.0000993179],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9767964,0.002874894,0.00002512586,0.003399109,0.0005687076,0.00005707813,0.000002298231,0.00001390784,0.01626249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979511,0.0004094224,0.0003052732,0.0009605139,0.000208558,1.393841e-7,0.00000468713,0.00000168139,0.0001585562],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02115478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998122,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008762414819868414,"score_gpt":0.2503219489674763,"score_spread":0.2415595341476079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}