{"id":"W2053342679","doi":"10.1007/s10933-009-9383-y","title":"Epiphytic diatoms as flood indicators","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Paleolimnology","topic":"Geology and Paleoclimatology Research","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Diatom; Macrophyte; Epiphyte; Flood myth; Floodplain; Substrate (aquarium); Ecology; Sedimentology; Environmental science; Relative species abundance; Hydrology (agriculture); Paleolimnology; Abundance (ecology); Physical geography; Geography; Geology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003618528,0.0002505496,0.0002051624,0.0008455825,0.0001850252,0.0005760058,0.0001970529,0.0003759506,0.0009469417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000578184,0.0002015994,0.000114037,0.0008197449,0.0001847752,0.0006149224,0.0004530115,0.0004047488,0.0002429651],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002807844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001620331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001917497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00537909,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998343,0.00005481722,0.00001132577,0.00003737468,0.00003854594,0.00002369382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996464,0.000149982,0.00006316949,0.00001769813,0.00006652192,0.00005628788],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001579447,0.0001263825,0.6011608,0.0002099814,0.0001337345,0.0001753753,0.0004213685,0.001123035,0.3435208,0.000494634,0.0003263008,0.05072822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004987544,0.0005275556,0.9181227,0.0000224304,0.0001652053,0.0003936356,0.0005981452,0.007055971,0.07013743,0.0004179214,0.002490145,0.00001905209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951953,0.0008764807,0.001542148,0.00002683318,0.000009981374,0.00001285501,0.0003269505,0.00001189556,0.001997448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964438,0.0005138851,0.001591714,0.00001543483,0.00001190527,0.00001021113,0.0002445501,0.000003624454,0.001164843],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001917497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003812611,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008762414819868414,"score_gpt":0.2503219489674763,"score_spread":0.2415595341476079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}