{"id":"W2053345529","doi":"10.1021/ac062299v","title":"An Approach for Assessing Total Instrumental Uncertainty in Compound-Specific Carbon Isotope Analysis:  Implications for Environmental Remediation Studies","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytical Chemistry","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Chemistry; Reproducibility; Isotope; Isotope analysis; Environmental chemistry; Environmental remediation; Isotopes of carbon; Isotope-ratio mass spectrometry; Mass spectrometry; Total organic carbon; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Contamination; Chromatography; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01377454,0.001357313,0.001654914,0.002776827,0.00105995,0.001991572,0.003110022,0.002104016,0.0006397445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02181299,0.0007156125,0.0009517419,0.00209194,0.001406313,0.002206301,0.002335895,0.003049179,0.0003708432],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001819617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00269003,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002730546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007094268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9884027,0.00278179,0.0006470366,0.001488343,0.006531649,0.0001485892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894443,0.004636293,0.001110657,0.001638803,0.00301083,0.000159125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003078305,0.0004301519,0.0182341,0.001121389,0.0006496352,0.0002467827,0.0004747552,0.02220498,0.618378,0.01773178,0.001664132,0.3185564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008736581,0.001469747,0.01943077,0.0002021057,0.0005297564,0.002808731,0.0002680802,0.2305311,0.6926256,0.03194071,0.01955309,0.0005529823],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01143359,0.0007592099,0.9862967,0.0001806584,0.00007089773,0.0001597348,0.0001374741,0.0003995568,0.0005622225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05508886,0.0005511856,0.9432285,0.0001452889,0.0000274834,0.0002759398,0.00009548675,0.00007088945,0.0005164376],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01377454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07284755,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02724336158985511,"score_gpt":0.3098494273478499,"score_spread":0.2826060657579947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}