{"id":"W2053345529","doi":"10.1021/ac062299v","title":"An Approach for Assessing Total Instrumental Uncertainty in Compound-Specific Carbon Isotope Analysis:  Implications for Environmental Remediation Studies","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytical Chemistry","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Chemistry; Reproducibility; Isotope; Isotope analysis; Environmental chemistry; Environmental remediation; Isotopes of carbon; Isotope-ratio mass spectrometry; Mass spectrometry; Total organic carbon; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Contamination; Chromatography; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008206132,0.0002162804,0.0004226674,0.00008581083,0.000178556,0.00004563897,0.0002770183,0.0001645146,0.0001089564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007372292,0.0002195379,0.0002637279,0.0005642338,0.0003488745,0.0002035923,0.0001048251,0.0001560094,0.000003001504],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001142371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001378647,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003200043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009639546,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979821,0.0000312429,0.0005749651,0.000694628,0.0002164757,0.0005005162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990011,0.0002647858,0.0001613417,0.000417644,0.00001536623,0.0001397752],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001230362,0.001227644,0.8487958,0.00004151596,0.000815034,0.000003768845,0.0003159392,0.03743458,0.1041666,0.0001538686,0.0001712043,0.006750965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001777131,0.0001116086,0.5645687,0.000006918721,0.001305902,0.00001586056,0.00547368,0.4144909,0.009948394,0.0007836693,0.0007129044,0.000804371],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827383,0.00005677517,0.01336535,0.0001309808,0.0000264352,0.0004119758,0.00003121726,0.00002567019,0.003213358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926256,0.0000156327,0.00618194,0.00007783552,0.0001128412,0.0001514425,0.000626862,0.00001796364,0.0001898816],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3770563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8952494,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02724336158985511,"score_gpt":0.3098494273478499,"score_spread":0.2826060657579947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}