{"id":"W2053526759","doi":"10.1021/es026366o","title":"Effect of pH on Mercury Uptake by an Aquatic Bacterium:  Implications for Hg Cycling","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Technology","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Mercury (programming language); Bioaccumulation; Environmental chemistry; Chemistry; Methylmercury; MERCURE; Cycling; Dissolved organic carbon; Bacteria; Inorganic chemistry; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007589831,0.0001901699,0.0002230776,0.0001463108,0.0004528555,0.00001509244,0.0004516015,0.00009456737,0.0003689895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001869503,0.0001614726,0.00005427054,0.0005780903,0.002122473,0.0003011565,0.00009050256,0.0001097084,0.0001413721],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002484429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001034067,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001035205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003895368,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984507,0.00005077323,0.0002771381,0.0005076749,0.0002592253,0.0004544717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991537,0.0001080009,0.0001482882,0.0004623814,0.000001897718,0.0001257106],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009247657,0.0001092239,0.03926442,0.00000265201,0.000004514353,1.387879e-7,0.00009775833,0.0000549529,0.9359356,0.0004892324,0.0001781634,0.02385409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005574978,0.001744641,0.05105813,0.000009018077,0.00003076497,0.00001246745,0.0002864501,0.0001058028,0.9337717,0.00196801,0.01018249,0.0002729897],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953067,0.00005312855,0.0008145357,0.0004878305,0.00008726218,0.0005514959,0.00003945321,0.00005727874,0.002602302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998821,0.00003982613,0.000745246,0.0001113196,0.000004956825,0.0001211684,0.00001091697,0.00001364319,0.0001319532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0235811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.782034,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01028841471436913,"score_gpt":0.2765242669109514,"score_spread":0.2662358521965823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}