{"id":"W2053573041","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-1130.2008.00198.x","title":"Choice as an Aspect of Quality of Life for People With Intellectual Disabilities","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","topic":"Disability Education and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Freedom of choice; Set (abstract data type); Quality (philosophy); Management science; Quality of life (healthcare); Psychology; Choice set; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Political science; Economics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009753834,0.0001822853,0.0003827032,0.00200365,0.002507395,0.006294634,0.0008745269,0.001498612,0.0028748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01807915,0.0001178147,0.0005597824,0.001919748,0.009049451,0.00478007,0.005161966,0.002272524,0.00008282666],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005911683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005367487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004351558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00526043,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903874,0.006759969,0.0005401097,0.0002297003,0.001351824,0.0007310082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772049,0.01459461,0.003006429,0.0005338853,0.00165449,0.003005662],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002124973,0.0006676092,0.1013591,0.001097151,0.00009431699,0.0007689164,0.08665809,0.001780571,0.0002681169,0.6135429,0.01282333,0.1807275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108451,0.0007325057,0.1596158,0.004547306,0.0001361281,0.001467435,0.2289171,0.00352943,0.0006485372,0.4853798,0.1146573,0.0002602736],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6156764,0.0223257,0.007548065,0.2013938,0.0009264078,0.000278647,0.000263925,0.00003126297,0.1515557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967464,0.001304137,0.0006978926,0.0006432993,0.0000697099,0.00003462045,0.00001140097,0.000001446523,0.0004910404],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009753834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05158383,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1033861076718673,"score_gpt":0.4500346143167475,"score_spread":0.3466485066448802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}