{"id":"W2053573041","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-1130.2008.00198.x","title":"Choice as an Aspect of Quality of Life for People With Intellectual Disabilities","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","topic":"Disability Education and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Freedom of choice; Set (abstract data type); Quality (philosophy); Management science; Quality of life (healthcare); Psychology; Choice set; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Political science; Economics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004269775,0.0001931001,0.00068928,0.0002585003,0.0001756807,0.00009103057,0.0003329037,0.0001175878,0.0006454384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6138735,0.0001580441,0.0001681039,0.0005531668,0.001522937,0.001212317,0.00002716049,0.0002766192,0.000002445154],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000257862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001823544,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01610923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009414106,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962059,0.001363506,0.001241665,0.0002223886,0.0006209378,0.0003456036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7983585,0.1987772,0.0009597081,0.0003672561,0.001144178,0.0003931881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003638902,0.001866288,0.004444813,0.0001774471,0.00006145246,8.186441e-8,0.8900328,0.00004077555,0.0000583286,0.09539201,0.0009957643,0.003291298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006768512,0.003509837,0.003818305,0.00009686527,0.00005031448,0.00001175929,0.9432957,0.000008088276,0.0002085867,0.03500118,0.01312896,0.0001935664],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9629401,0.0002807787,0.0001053162,0.01800088,0.000146029,0.0003851973,0.0000207352,0.00001114438,0.01810982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973443,0.0004260242,0.0005318329,0.0006626182,0.0004592925,0.00001165261,0.000002189435,0.00001132971,0.0005508167],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6096038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9904426,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1033861076718673,"score_gpt":0.4500346143167475,"score_spread":0.3466485066448802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}