{"id":"W2053677697","doi":"10.1103/physreve.61.1455","title":"Shear-thinning-induced chaos in Taylor-Couette flow","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics","topic":"Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies","field":"Chemical Engineering","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Taylor dispersion; Shear thinning; Taylor–Couette flow; Couette flow; Mechanics; Physics; Newtonian fluid; Taylor number; Generalized Newtonian fluid; Herschel–Bulkley fluid; Classical mechanics; Shear flow; Bingham plastic; Vortex; Shear rate; Viscosity; Flow (mathematics); Thermodynamics; Rheology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001983572,0.0001941969,0.0002163932,0.0004271212,0.0003794679,0.0004036019,0.0001706566,0.0002321306,0.0003035852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007183706,0.0001550251,0.0002405525,0.0001692036,0.0006595043,0.0002598178,0.0003074741,0.0002266489,0.00006445579],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003882943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002082946,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009143797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004028758,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999935,0.00001747576,0.000003665791,0.000009026539,0.00001613133,0.0000187003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997844,0.00007718266,0.00007529958,0.00001484095,0.00002649185,0.00002180486],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004504968,0.00007340316,0.006156378,0.0001878168,0.00004713828,0.001242419,0.0006960768,0.2864032,0.6020874,0.08554213,0.0004578318,0.01665557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003306615,0.0001198629,0.003806408,0.00001437189,0.00001670178,0.0002005752,0.00004845585,0.8997747,0.08213238,0.01304714,0.0007728693,0.00003360583],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9830047,0.0004308879,0.01400674,0.00006491032,0.00001859109,0.00001347845,0.00001981228,0.00004801072,0.002392732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983412,0.0001259492,0.001258445,0.000004955826,0.000005089745,0.000004376801,0.000008536506,0.000003818898,0.0002474866],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0009143797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.002817273,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009822183117899676,"score_gpt":0.2904874576423776,"score_spread":0.2806652745244779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}