{"id":"W2053678438","doi":"10.1007/bf02704965","title":"Birds as surrogates for biodiversity: An analysis of a data set from southern Québec","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biosciences","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Biodiversity; Endangered species; Scale (ratio); Set (abstract data type); Geography; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Field (mathematics); Conservation biology; Global biodiversity; Biology; Computer science; Cartography; Environmental science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001476649,0.0005687764,0.0007051575,0.002257541,0.001563329,0.001276781,0.001807329,0.001093287,0.002625433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006396968,0.0002835288,0.0005939527,0.006630762,0.000999734,0.0005217026,0.0006408735,0.0009005076,0.0004082026],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009147917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004651329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9761626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9859841,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992929,0.0002223551,0.00003565705,0.0001037554,0.0001800931,0.0001653284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991185,0.004707676,0.0008342137,0.0005812747,0.002201973,0.0004898338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001175445,0.0003948493,0.8587449,0.0002353731,0.001033467,0.001623779,0.00116275,0.0790027,0.0016497,0.001700698,0.02762981,0.02564655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001223482,0.0000758563,0.9312673,0.00006168439,0.0001332843,0.0001673142,0.001422398,0.05802016,0.0004209678,0.0002888054,0.007954819,0.00006501689],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9837564,0.0005366275,0.0005885966,0.0003683632,0.000008544906,0.00003395727,0.01371992,0.00004057248,0.0009471542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704009,0.0002416158,0.001291075,0.0001129259,0.00001180607,0.00003912481,0.02607686,0.00002850593,0.001797217],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02383745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06637305,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2813352051237686,"score_gpt":0.2643592963273032,"score_spread":0.01697590879646549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}