{"id":"W2053678438","doi":"10.1007/bf02704965","title":"Birds as surrogates for biodiversity: An analysis of a data set from southern Québec","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biosciences","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Biodiversity; Endangered species; Scale (ratio); Set (abstract data type); Geography; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Field (mathematics); Conservation biology; Global biodiversity; Biology; Computer science; Cartography; Environmental science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008110995,0.0000550636,0.0002747083,0.0002939338,0.00007982188,0.00003835886,0.0004944081,0.00003263686,0.001156325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007480115,0.00005110958,0.0001099719,0.0002097793,0.0001134385,0.0006517328,0.00004953012,0.00003693535,0.00008528194],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004707527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001480395,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009919928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002867505,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992488,0.0000120716,0.0004234677,0.0001838698,0.00004480521,0.00008699268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989405,0.00007479284,0.0007186452,0.0001968258,0.00001444401,0.00005476046],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007646371,0.00007705249,0.9963128,0.000001760326,0.0001965405,3.100775e-7,0.001672286,0.000242028,0.0001157895,0.0001282093,0.0002502462,0.0009953459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009612438,0.0006869118,0.8337752,0.00001097618,0.0005235476,0.000002741886,0.01192995,0.1413318,0.0003621984,0.003630611,0.006480473,0.0003042963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961613,0.0007106794,0.0005408457,0.0005262743,0.0001116561,0.00003347702,0.001750143,0.000002064302,0.0001635086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986691,0.0001946807,0.0009138864,0.00007945784,0.00003348706,2.517799e-7,0.00002742588,0.000002020405,0.00007964062],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1625376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997568,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2813352051237686,"score_gpt":0.2643592963273032,"score_spread":0.01697590879646549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}