{"id":"W2053678458","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2004.11.008","title":"Structural development following fire in black spruce boreal forest","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Ecology and Management","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Chronosequence; Basal area; Black spruce; Snag; Taiga; Stand development; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Environmental science; Boreal; Fire regime; Forestry; Physical geography; Ecosystem; Geography; Biology; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003810446,0.0001419408,0.0001722884,0.0007275795,0.0006085209,0.0006187577,0.0005363032,0.0005441391,0.002214259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001490384,0.000159621,0.0002344835,0.0003736698,0.0005058286,0.0004068676,0.000563951,0.0004844562,0.0002471379],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008078176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004324288,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09738427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998316,0.00002842728,0.000007896801,0.00002645502,0.0000264739,0.00007925755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987281,0.0001836602,0.000420127,0.00004927239,0.0001705035,0.0004482669],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001524479,0.0003743516,0.9771495,0.0000277752,0.00006724328,0.0003616814,0.0008777423,0.0005687762,0.008833868,0.0001605675,0.0002316918,0.009822395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000274348,0.00006314753,0.9993532,0.000001380108,0.000003183527,0.00006154124,0.0002326661,0.00009841429,0.000101222,0.0000183343,0.00006232203,0.000001908577],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996018,0.00003924712,0.00001406242,0.0000132563,0.000001658235,0.000002064187,0.00006167505,0.000001043616,0.0002651621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995267,0.00002391992,0.00002560976,0.000006336419,0.000002541882,0.000002733021,0.0001120871,6.667108e-7,0.0002994632],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.034592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06878132,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01272074886769346,"score_gpt":0.1974367165954625,"score_spread":0.184715967727769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}