{"id":"W2053759395","doi":"10.1002/j.1538-165x.2006.tb00586.x","title":"The Canadian Supreme Court: Attitudinal Conflict in Right to Counsel Cases","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Politics; Law; Political science; Abortion; Supreme Court Decisions; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008200966,0.000270531,0.0004091294,0.003605386,0.02636329,0.006696285,0.001774242,0.004067037,0.00649666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03807135,0.0003760219,0.000306997,0.008541266,0.01188228,0.002536947,0.002790801,0.004873103,0.0002514969],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1131816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1014369,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9878666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903371,0.00158612,0.0001757095,0.0004913277,0.00464008,0.002769601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878529,0.005245246,0.001055594,0.0002340665,0.003303759,0.002308391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002824476,0.0002286815,0.1380556,0.0001532611,0.00008486012,0.001650908,0.120815,0.0009928058,0.0006302261,0.5760528,0.09619785,0.06485556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001698741,0.00005992118,0.5624112,0.0006956765,0.0001980574,0.000576504,0.1740886,0.002244742,0.0005328667,0.08036004,0.1783279,0.0003345921],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5761471,0.007855789,0.0005352617,0.1035141,0.0002465008,0.00008910493,0.0005509169,0.00001540355,0.3110459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899185,0.001529173,0.0001502417,0.004093471,0.00005176875,0.00001903672,0.00008259159,0.00000689005,0.004148315],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1131816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8211937,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02948901404579117,"score_gpt":0.3198903980472642,"score_spread":0.290401384001473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}