{"id":"W2054045323","doi":"10.1016/j.aquabot.2005.07.002","title":"Mapping the invasive species Phragmites australis in linear wetland corridors","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquatic Botany","topic":"Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministère des Transports","keywords":"Phragmites; Panchromatic film; Wetland; Abundance (ecology); Context (archaeology); Macrophyte; Environmental science; Typha; Habitat; Invasive species; Remote sensing; Aquatic plant; Ecology; Cartography; Geography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003328818,0.0001506808,0.0001668724,0.00003446029,0.0001060133,0.0000435324,0.0003073265,0.0000534938,0.001625462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001349699,0.0001068548,0.00005219094,0.0003442639,0.0001162763,0.0001858934,0.0001888421,0.0001588694,0.001817258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002140076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001110287,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001230145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05026733,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987831,0.00006126403,0.0003060066,0.0002399447,0.0002746924,0.0003350213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992706,0.0002643978,0.00008874183,0.0003063493,0.000003045197,0.00006683479],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001754519,0.0001075121,0.9595554,0.0000198972,0.00002351535,0.00003655449,0.004820675,0.01168104,0.009211713,0.00008498512,0.007159993,0.007281151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009750502,0.0000720671,0.6799627,0.0001436014,0.00002238814,0.00006135584,0.003714233,0.2550595,0.0007536526,0.0009364305,0.05770068,0.0005983068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896781,0.00003681511,0.0003141042,0.001922257,0.000140498,0.0002871994,0.000007678351,0.00002807649,0.007585251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939937,0.00003655779,0.0006961605,0.0002902076,0.0001088735,0.00001739306,0.000003790797,0.00001395924,0.004839343],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2795927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02036262225241473,"score_gpt":0.2132730989506927,"score_spread":0.192910476698278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}