{"id":"W2054147923","doi":"10.1002/eqe.38","title":"Consistency of dynamic site response at Port Island","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","topic":"Seismic Performance and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Transportation of Ontario","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Geology; Foreshock; Earthquake shaking table; Aftershock; Seismology; Geodesy; Consistency (knowledge bases); Peak ground acceleration; Response analysis; Magnitude (astronomy); Amplitude; Geotechnical engineering; Ground motion; Engineering; Structural engineering; Mathematics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003486164,0.0001916199,0.0002002868,0.0003735981,0.0001462577,0.0003714947,0.0003506718,0.0003032679,0.00108146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001584573,0.000137461,0.0001582635,0.0002986934,0.0001888324,0.0002734467,0.0002941803,0.0002459862,0.0001699195],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004302732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002597014,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01959997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02386931,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997657,0.00003470334,0.00001181742,0.00008631712,0.0000679062,0.00003361328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999499,0.0001311018,0.00006338766,0.00009372584,0.0001648052,0.00004806105],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005024318,0.0001422258,0.6441779,0.00004864234,0.000140129,0.0005834849,0.0004067514,0.2689542,0.0365491,0.0005839592,0.0008982209,0.04701306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001648004,0.0001263639,0.5602612,0.000006496178,0.00001736711,0.00008181362,0.0002632389,0.431663,0.006844079,0.000192606,0.0005037145,0.00002354866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981892,0.000005130614,0.001013626,0.00001374294,0.000001716231,0.000004973308,0.0001509516,0.00005374206,0.0005670279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993936,0.000003088237,0.0002057857,0.000002024883,4.123893e-7,0.000002253117,0.000237701,0.000005215852,0.0001500227],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01959997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03897178,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.003185482979931309,"score_gpt":0.1880939383293133,"score_spread":0.1849084553493819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}