{"id":"W2054150179","doi":"10.1115/detc2010-28214","title":"Vibration and Buckling Response of Width Tapered Laminated Composite Beams Using Ritz Method for Rotorcraft Blade","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Ritz method; Buckling; Materials science; Structural engineering; Vibration; Beam (structure); Boundary value problem; Ultimate tensile strength; Composite number; Composite material; Parametric statistics; Finite element method; Stiffness; Mathematics; Engineering; Physics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002499228,0.0001085409,0.0001887693,0.0001300737,0.00006497398,0.00003939931,0.0000521679,0.00008793319,0.00002736175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003143225,0.0001022066,0.00005109268,0.0001727654,0.00001618346,0.000122483,0.00001544072,0.00008388972,1.627337e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001448106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007900444,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003453256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003645297,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994165,0.00003612315,0.0002346827,0.0001301344,0.00007487697,0.0001077072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995423,0.0001546638,0.00004685976,0.0001310201,0.00008691748,0.00003821613],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006990766,0.000004428203,0.0001216524,0.00002454343,0.00003579613,1.688788e-7,0.0001382129,0.2089006,0.78878,0.00008130477,0.000007690286,0.0018357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000251151,0.00002016343,0.001443242,0.000008558007,0.00005730353,0.00000358275,0.00001444778,0.726725,0.2712124,0.00006237652,0.0001135941,0.00008807968],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4507285,0.00001913271,0.5489236,0.00002008028,0.00005678374,0.0001379998,0.000005172567,0.00004714151,0.00006155395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5838705,0.000002788998,0.4160302,0.00001146432,0.00002689621,0.00000338923,0.0000172028,0.0000139953,0.0000235831],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5178245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4167866,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005517382344416466,"score_gpt":0.2488897174845849,"score_spread":0.2433723351401685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}