{"id":"W2054174120","doi":"10.5539/ijel.v4n3p74","title":"A Critical Discourse Analysis of Government Spokesman’s Identity Construction: A Case Study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of English Linguistics","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Duty; Perspective (graphical); Government (linguistics); Critical discourse analysis; China; Image (mathematics); Position (finance); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Linguistics; Epistemology; Media studies; Political science; Aesthetics; Law; Computer science; Business; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008919254,0.000861329,0.0005102708,0.003419453,0.02449441,0.00597759,0.001858659,0.00418523,0.00316656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01146538,0.0005004067,0.0004405993,0.003525398,0.0154598,0.006542122,0.00470366,0.004289483,0.0003723197],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01104967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005764025,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0160479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02527043,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9905894,0.007250935,0.0001941748,0.0004921869,0.0007013174,0.0007720895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985617,0.0112852,0.0007833719,0.0004881849,0.00118949,0.0006368001],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003274091,0.00008442651,0.001040582,0.00006591957,0.000003097245,0.002646285,0.9666081,0.00004480045,0.0005967318,0.02385306,0.001105401,0.003918798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008679619,0.00003480616,0.001028033,0.0001406059,0.000008023922,0.0006573156,0.9654312,0.0003167976,0.001420226,0.00250891,0.02843014,0.00001545939],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.934658,0.0008129831,0.008689164,0.006937681,0.0002181517,0.0003266675,0.0001065619,0.00004430182,0.04820647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879289,0.0004046048,0.003333975,0.0003112238,0.00003578764,0.0001303084,0.00004840212,0.00002911919,0.007777705],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02449441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08017135,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.019373058468619,"score_gpt":0.3346356561352339,"score_spread":0.3152625976666149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}