{"id":"W2054174120","doi":"10.5539/ijel.v4n3p74","title":"A Critical Discourse Analysis of Government Spokesman’s Identity Construction: A Case Study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of English Linguistics","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Duty; Perspective (graphical); Government (linguistics); Critical discourse analysis; China; Image (mathematics); Position (finance); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Linguistics; Epistemology; Media studies; Political science; Aesthetics; Law; Computer science; Business; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007205409,0.000136546,0.0004680007,0.0003223864,0.0001077861,0.0002208278,0.0003607791,0.00002414084,0.0008417304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04454874,0.000114868,0.0003604916,0.0001066791,0.0004948815,0.0001901338,0.0001075899,0.0001857691,0.000001666539],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009032696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000304815,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000219996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002571546,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976184,0.000100861,0.0008248911,0.0001383158,0.001196604,0.0001209205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840501,0.0004427196,0.0005884038,0.000181297,0.01466708,0.0000704059],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001116252,0.001836588,0.03983978,0.00002106025,0.01885333,0.002431879,0.08106632,0.001076272,8.211786e-7,0.8509945,0.001539113,0.002228717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001986232,0.001014206,0.002004529,0.0001338216,0.02287865,0.00009604811,0.852986,0.00174625,0.00002977097,0.004313165,0.1122703,0.0005410007],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.819917,0.0001859877,0.002525664,0.00006284216,0.02755866,0.0001011384,0.0002844671,0.00002109311,0.1493432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873648,0.00001054268,0.0005297579,0.00004433306,0.01190613,0.000001609687,0.000003091558,0.000009866068,0.0001298685],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8466813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9634994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.019373058468619,"score_gpt":0.3346356561352339,"score_spread":0.3152625976666149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}