{"id":"W2054216844","doi":"10.1002/ieam.1287","title":"Rebuttal to the response of Bosker et al. (2012) to “Canada's environmental effects monitoring program: Areas for improvement” (Huebert et al. 2011)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Stantec (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Rebuttal; Citation; Library science; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Law; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001398832,0.0006616177,0.0004553843,0.00009925218,0.0003743358,0.00009942419,0.0005290477,0.00008526074,0.0005691025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001261595,0.0005209689,0.000166474,0.0001691845,0.0002127788,0.0005406571,0.00124394,0.0003186469,0.0001340754],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00193999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002800174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007483594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002313853,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959796,0.0003073486,0.0006212475,0.0008080516,0.001187897,0.00109585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982922,0.0002065346,0.0002365231,0.0006098578,0.000003155111,0.0006517174],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001298767,0.004273607,0.3891526,0.00007864395,0.0008318505,0.00002954917,0.001768483,0.0004876032,0.1872021,0.0002022785,0.2338692,0.1808054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009002572,0.0009059848,0.5912598,0.00004918949,0.000101194,0.00000379036,0.001740499,0.00005247268,0.005900848,0.00002066985,0.3985688,0.0004964941],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9768718,0.0001533429,0.001620846,0.01337319,0.0007805328,0.005498978,0.0002627755,0.00006325823,0.001375218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679899,0.0005238554,0.006956607,0.01878079,0.00003892435,0.001866086,0.0001586957,0.00009294121,0.003592184],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2021073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997242,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008234687052015324,"score_gpt":0.2892501345202252,"score_spread":0.2810154474682099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}