{"id":"W2054220324","doi":"10.1016/j.jcct.2014.07.002","title":"Fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography: Variation of repeated analyses","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography","topic":"Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Paul's Hospital","funders":"Novo Nordisk Fonden; Universitätsklinikum Erlangen; Aarhus Universitetshospital","keywords":"Medicine; Fractional flow reserve; Coronary artery disease; Cardiology; Reproducibility; Computed tomography angiography; Coronary angiography; Confidence interval; Internal medicine; Angiography; Coefficient of variation; Radiology; Nuclear medicine; Myocardial infarction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009894652,0.0002262183,0.001153223,0.001160007,0.00007223751,0.00003311617,0.0001569598,0.00008853989,0.00002248253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003812258,0.0002000165,0.006332621,0.001250076,0.000105934,0.0001739453,0.00004364122,0.0003730047,0.000002105243],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003268472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001082709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002778693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001368691,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971125,0.0004357273,0.0007899092,0.0002586887,0.001193059,0.0002101716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967917,0.0005226347,0.0005156588,0.0006222391,0.001326712,0.0002210541],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001364899,0.0008064843,0.7030525,0.0001692883,0.0909447,0.00112653,0.0002700042,0.1659474,0.00669129,0.0000330794,0.003936174,0.02565772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004708841,0.0003488105,0.9726052,0.0003367808,0.007181182,0.0007322269,0.00003598665,0.007303338,0.002209807,0.0003440378,0.003998444,0.000195334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.69069,0.02728937,0.2803029,0.0001478852,0.0009487566,0.0001829878,0.00004780197,0.00005732954,0.0003330481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711712,0.0002641114,0.02749752,0.0001051183,0.0008176815,0.000001993861,0.0001125103,0.00002846586,0.000001394897],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2804812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8156435,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01903175185490244,"score_gpt":0.264544485030999,"score_spread":0.2455127331760965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}