{"id":"W2054220324","doi":"10.1016/j.jcct.2014.07.002","title":"Fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography: Variation of repeated analyses","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography","topic":"Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Paul's Hospital","funders":"Novo Nordisk Fonden; Universitätsklinikum Erlangen; Aarhus Universitetshospital","keywords":"Medicine; Fractional flow reserve; Coronary artery disease; Cardiology; Reproducibility; Computed tomography angiography; Coronary angiography; Confidence interval; Internal medicine; Angiography; Coefficient of variation; Radiology; Nuclear medicine; Myocardial infarction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03301458,0.00083413,0.001755975,0.001272496,0.0006659111,0.001506552,0.001327512,0.001591058,0.0008007403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07389815,0.0005063805,0.001498995,0.001090394,0.001324923,0.0008852843,0.0009308343,0.001342868,0.0004096239],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005202333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004052134,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002750656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002448656,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9604749,0.02377464,0.001900845,0.00755509,0.005294557,0.0009999374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8542229,0.09924839,0.005046349,0.03607956,0.004740024,0.0006627986],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008558493,0.0007383967,0.8239949,0.0002542492,0.01391427,0.001170749,0.004030759,0.01380261,0.04643616,0.002608967,0.002397925,0.08209249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007335813,0.0007862171,0.962608,0.00002644033,0.001447378,0.0009219332,0.0002087934,0.0264908,0.004147349,0.001506858,0.001676149,0.0001067078],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9446704,0.001280858,0.05100156,0.00008680031,0.0001982562,0.0001053273,0.0005881087,0.0004109652,0.001657681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961355,0.00005835879,0.002683368,0.00003599405,0.00005001865,0.0000605868,0.0003992289,0.0001982159,0.0003787806],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03301458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1745999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01903175185490244,"score_gpt":0.264544485030999,"score_spread":0.2455127331760965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}