{"id":"W2054262779","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2003.08.001","title":"A state-of-practice survey of policy, plan, and program assessment in Canadian provinces","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Directive; Legislature; Plan (archaeology); Impact assessment; Environmental planning; Public administration; Environmental impact assessment; Order (exchange); Business; Political science; Environmental resource management; Geography; Finance; Economics; Law; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01978177,0.0002483324,0.0006252117,0.01232944,0.006571869,0.005044462,0.004011154,0.001194454,0.002726748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07511757,0.0008968735,0.0005790496,0.02843387,0.001633247,0.001385106,0.002038593,0.00117083,0.0001946013],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1873087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4096571,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9672806,0.003092584,0.002574896,0.00137227,0.02109118,0.004588504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.805705,0.02399285,0.01396125,0.00301431,0.1329114,0.02041519],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003675602,0.0002211699,0.752912,0.001924103,0.0002439148,0.0003165856,0.02055143,0.001845746,0.0008447791,0.005994365,0.05313844,0.1616398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002571804,0.00007484337,0.9151632,0.0008116346,0.00008910659,0.00008604132,0.01370914,0.0007083755,0.0003083669,0.0001900868,0.06876718,0.00006637583],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8584121,0.02241699,0.001343654,0.02808231,0.0002297076,0.001347673,0.01878476,0.0002068221,0.069176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773436,0.009332206,0.001897039,0.001649892,0.00003231936,0.0002707825,0.003636046,0.00003563739,0.005802569],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8126913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9426067,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01912474753371391,"score_gpt":0.3788091897312692,"score_spread":0.3596844421975553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}