{"id":"W2054262779","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2003.08.001","title":"A state-of-practice survey of policy, plan, and program assessment in Canadian provinces","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Directive; Legislature; Plan (archaeology); Impact assessment; Environmental planning; Public administration; Environmental impact assessment; Order (exchange); Business; Political science; Environmental resource management; Geography; Finance; Economics; Law; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002817149,0.0004710941,0.0009335683,0.0001604964,0.0001043021,0.00003369749,0.0003225423,0.0001011845,0.001184872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003318535,0.0004012693,0.0001487485,0.0006156524,0.0006123472,0.0008566393,0.0002048911,0.0003880887,0.00002788333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003755529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006064448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2638145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05193003,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995599,0.001152604,0.001028704,0.0005358393,0.0008418147,0.0008420857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978924,0.000350899,0.0006367931,0.0004681772,0.000007942658,0.000643753],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001132348,0.0009539277,0.9552492,0.0002521735,0.000106448,0.00002087884,0.0002745659,0.00008597688,0.0009348993,0.00007260776,0.0001813085,0.04185672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005592455,0.0006704424,0.9933892,0.0005350336,0.00007068961,0.00003196575,0.0002294908,0.00005524447,0.0002210476,0.0001404078,0.003708441,0.0003887859],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9732419,0.01063449,0.00001308193,0.000279491,0.00007859481,0.002442376,0.0002566588,0.00001754353,0.01303584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.948809,0.04691494,0.003499681,0.0004018479,0.000006914851,0.0001185735,0.0001110868,0.00003882252,0.0000990932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2118845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01912474753371391,"score_gpt":0.3788091897312692,"score_spread":0.3596844421975553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}