{"id":"W2054271158","doi":"10.1002/cae.20058","title":"Process control through a case study: A mixing process. I. SISO case","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","topic":"Experimental Learning in Engineering","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Context (archaeology); Linearization; Process control; Control theory (sociology); Computer science; Mixing (physics); Sizing; Control engineering; Instrumentation (computer programming); Feedback linearization; Control (management); MIMO; Engineering; Nonlinear system; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002121236,0.0008058459,0.0006599863,0.0007600547,0.001637442,0.002245628,0.001197085,0.004775168,0.005143977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005068119,0.0004127834,0.0009401235,0.0009159632,0.001602979,0.001433557,0.001551006,0.001584124,0.0006214233],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001058435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001278145,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004514445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004864192,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984101,0.0007153942,0.00009407554,0.0001734084,0.0004171053,0.0001898284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948419,0.003833339,0.0002906415,0.0003524542,0.0003451616,0.0003365636],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002542908,0.006857879,0.02383475,0.001984539,0.0002304401,0.02358872,0.006932503,0.7189261,0.02671677,0.07078443,0.00504638,0.1125545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001045942,0.004105628,0.00621645,0.0001832435,0.0001666277,0.002763203,0.006033324,0.8783573,0.04895978,0.01728558,0.03469956,0.0001833584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.8240711,0.0006499399,0.1454277,0.001356054,0.0001151329,0.001289226,0.000506265,0.0003464452,0.02623822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9479895,0.0003531378,0.04467013,0.00009121655,0.00001626071,0.0004386055,0.0001172473,0.00002921972,0.006294695],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005143977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01720828,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006758966205926476,"score_gpt":0.2767729238283484,"score_spread":0.2700139576224219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}