{"id":"W2054383752","doi":"10.1002/smj.577","title":"The legitimacy of strategic alliances: an institutional perspective","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":775,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; Memorial University of Newfoundland; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Legitimation; Alliance; Perspective (graphical); Business; Corporate governance; Function (biology); Institutional theory; Outcome (game theory); Industrial organization; Political science; Economics; Management; Microeconomics; Politics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01128931,0.0001746854,0.0004517288,0.003184784,0.002987835,0.01259959,0.001129695,0.002454788,0.0055326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05130056,0.0003282899,0.0003316917,0.001842072,0.02060298,0.01039882,0.005242849,0.00283605,0.0003528866],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004087146,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001439382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001066894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9898106,0.006076508,0.0005402353,0.0007130782,0.001994846,0.0008648104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9355836,0.04205978,0.008652947,0.006115097,0.004929038,0.002659523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008197479,0.00001347497,0.001282334,0.00002049787,0.000004028575,0.00005470829,0.0006425565,0.0007601393,0.00009922115,0.9931016,0.0001842175,0.003829015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001750187,0.00003164118,0.002017143,0.0001081582,0.00001098447,0.0001666635,0.001816833,0.003954194,0.0003119188,0.9815701,0.009977579,0.00001734396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3722953,0.003452538,0.1390047,0.03576369,0.0002297641,0.0001388921,0.0001500504,0.0001761462,0.4487889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974397,0.0002314925,0.001424394,0.00008005531,0.00005033338,0.00001812536,0.00001367358,0.000005064271,0.0007371641],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01259959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0597043,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05165823115616942,"score_gpt":0.2747889208836902,"score_spread":0.2231306897275208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}