{"id":"W2054506403","doi":"10.1080/08263663.2008.10816938","title":"Applying the Concept of “Human Security” in Latin America: an Argentine Case Study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies / Revue canadienne des études latino-américaines et caraïbes","topic":"Peacebuilding and International Security","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Human security; Framing (construction); Latin Americans; Context (archaeology); Consistency (knowledge bases); Sociology; Conceptual framework; Meaning (existential); Political science; Epistemology; Social science; Law; Geography; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001292795,0.0003074157,0.0008912929,0.0004724312,0.00124306,0.00007086822,0.0004831488,0.00005823766,0.00002063416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001189711,0.000259654,0.0001569623,0.001108441,0.003385338,0.0002967799,0.0000650869,0.0004839929,3.810611e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005607082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006302432,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5713333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9409208,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969569,0.0007726069,0.0009372036,0.0003420434,0.0002809762,0.0007102984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966838,0.0006085094,0.0008579936,0.0002703291,0.000813442,0.0007658823],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001696783,0.0001360229,0.4428395,0.00003220079,0.0003272952,0.003320877,0.5379798,0.0002328318,0.00004602998,0.009330259,0.0003523669,0.005385884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008322283,0.001152255,0.1246912,0.0001892948,0.0001307621,0.0009537019,0.8546557,0.0001120639,0.00001261472,0.0004205075,0.01635138,0.0004982967],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951048,0.00209364,0.000005342602,0.0004898511,0.0001907034,0.000555382,0.00006740503,0.00001418898,0.001478612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983784,0.0006753476,0.0002264609,0.0002561643,0.0002796737,0.00005312921,0.000006071666,0.00002713959,0.00009761308],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3695875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999856,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07416674291635522,"score_gpt":0.32754983372753,"score_spread":0.2533830908111748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}