{"id":"W2054519386","doi":"10.1509/jmkr.48.5.827","title":"Mental Simulation and Product Evaluation: The Affective and Cognitive Dimensions of Process versus Outcome Simulation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Research","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":144,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Process (computing); Product (mathematics); Cognition; Premise; Computer science; Psychology; New product development; Focus (optics); Mode (computer interface); Regulatory focus theory; Social psychology; Marketing; Human–computer interaction; Business; Economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01306886,0.00005988591,0.0001247184,0.0001834605,0.0002300919,0.00001363014,0.00006694415,0.00004315756,0.0003313871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004004935,0.00003755221,0.00004043455,0.0002073271,0.0001834732,0.0001463227,0.00004167735,0.0003945471,0.000002279682],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004419414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006994025,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003792363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001445588,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967519,0.002045677,0.0003805476,0.0001273286,0.0005135224,0.0001810028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949201,0.003141631,0.0002793035,0.00008277001,0.001505294,0.0000708505],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02580225,0.0008375904,0.5522474,0.0001524158,0.000227234,0.000008522467,0.0240459,0.0003312803,0.00008246095,0.00008810253,0.0002623994,0.3959145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001868252,0.0009138332,0.9841855,0.0001975703,0.00009451945,0.00001154023,0.007552433,0.004876052,0.00004385917,0.0001626672,0.00004695251,0.00004688021],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969667,0.0007683815,0.00002208645,0.000172857,0.0002649305,0.0005827692,0.000005066334,0.000002652971,0.0012146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997956,0.00001304332,0.00003072987,0.000006163003,0.00007354317,0.00001345352,0.000001328683,0.000007106313,0.0000590675],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4319381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4794571,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4467641034432518,"score_gpt":0.5928877024328916,"score_spread":0.1461235989896397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}