{"id":"W2054647540","doi":"10.1023/a:1010659703309","title":"Evaluating the comprehensibility of jury instructions: A method and an example.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Human Behavior","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Jury instructions; Jury; Legal psychology; Psychology; Deliberation; Comprehension; Set (abstract data type); Hearsay; Computer science; Social psychology; Law; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04803678,0.001337817,0.0006536919,0.002280928,0.00135222,0.00137865,0.001769686,0.001992093,0.003460127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1280565,0.0005539337,0.0008016862,0.002026319,0.001900516,0.001514013,0.001993148,0.001514729,0.001165444],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001334902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003146426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005123398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01468372,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9640716,0.02854634,0.001579356,0.0009325495,0.004497395,0.0003727381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9065148,0.07329746,0.003234769,0.007862383,0.008298528,0.0007920527],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00231601,0.004744343,0.03760322,0.002621116,0.0001953197,0.000650055,0.02910964,0.002668422,0.03659276,0.008282821,0.0106497,0.8645665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003946345,0.03472236,0.418217,0.005398088,0.001091586,0.01035082,0.03453869,0.08004536,0.1967986,0.04549773,0.166211,0.003182487],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.3627018,0.002563137,0.5931379,0.002677577,0.0004298647,0.01891762,0.001346728,0.001683733,0.01654164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2548677,0.001339843,0.7281939,0.0004279088,0.00004674564,0.01087131,0.0004331868,0.0001263804,0.003692972],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04803678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2540457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3358301573386193,"score_gpt":0.5286683274996828,"score_spread":0.1928381701610635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}