{"id":"W2054647540","doi":"10.1023/a:1010659703309","title":"Evaluating the comprehensibility of jury instructions: A method and an example.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Human Behavior","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Jury instructions; Jury; Legal psychology; Psychology; Deliberation; Comprehension; Set (abstract data type); Hearsay; Computer science; Social psychology; Law; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001253509,0.00006337615,0.0001234088,0.00002379838,0.001031096,0.00009072434,0.0001268116,0.00004827477,0.0001233382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004182688,0.00004770997,0.00001996768,0.0001081594,0.0005789255,0.0001929383,0.00005158851,0.00008564992,6.171705e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001055884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003229623,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00466756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009253642,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998937,0.0003009335,0.0001838764,0.0002094918,0.0002476698,0.0001209934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993263,0.0002109238,0.00008163085,0.0002073675,0.0001182225,0.00005550979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002083813,0.0001495798,0.02336553,0.00001619152,0.000006135273,0.000002113228,0.01250908,0.00000267755,0.002848079,0.6288326,0.00001503,0.3322321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006568842,0.000467544,0.8508736,0.00004344971,0.000221791,0.00002821455,0.009276513,0.00002346775,0.0001933087,0.1121874,0.02574169,0.0002860943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961604,0.000105917,0.00008427748,0.00004922708,0.00006641269,0.0002053018,0.000002464478,0.00003093558,0.003295006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949918,0.00001520187,0.004601961,0.00008680184,0.00006676613,0.00001781778,0.000001033221,0.000005135224,0.0002135327],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8275081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7930463,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3358301573386193,"score_gpt":0.5286683274996828,"score_spread":0.1928381701610635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}