{"id":"W2054690354","doi":"10.5194/acp-13-1625-2013","title":"Antarctic ozone loss in 1979–2010: first sign of ozone recovery","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atmospheric chemistry and physics","topic":"Atmospheric Ozone and Climate","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institut Polaire Français Paul Emile Victor; Natural Environment Research Council; Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales; Universität Heidelberg; European Commission; Goddard Space Flight Center; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Sight Research UK; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research; Macquarie University","keywords":"Ozone; Stratosphere; Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer; Atmospheric sciences; Ozone layer; Polar vortex; Ozone depletion; Environmental science; Climatology; Satellite; Meteorology; Geology; Geography; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000221642,0.0002296814,0.0002028769,0.0007382164,0.0001992726,0.0004129971,0.0001804811,0.0003362,0.001150421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006423123,0.00007402102,0.0002504961,0.000847049,0.0001570959,0.0003420643,0.0004436333,0.0003401328,0.0004169454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005670019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003466276,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0270887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02941926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999056,0.000008932165,0.00001127449,0.00001972765,0.0000296616,0.00002474382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996127,0.00002751838,0.0001421963,0.00002643703,0.0001418415,0.0000493903],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004988606,0.00005643471,0.978797,0.00008578538,0.0001482339,0.0002800039,0.0001355326,0.0007593302,0.005809891,0.0001178703,0.002343734,0.01096732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002175178,0.00002003762,0.9985675,0.000003539232,0.000009029553,0.00004016403,0.00003956884,0.0002027555,0.0004172146,0.000006783292,0.0006897625,0.000001565593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901291,0.0005216259,0.000121687,0.0001952577,0.00002891812,0.00001281225,0.005578042,0.00002881304,0.00338386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942927,0.0002371063,0.0001115305,0.0000569527,0.00002318888,0.000008306924,0.004724029,0.000004804553,0.0005413254],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0270887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05386204,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006857549889218469,"score_gpt":0.1822367313703419,"score_spread":0.1753791814811235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}