{"id":"W2054690354","doi":"10.5194/acp-13-1625-2013","title":"Antarctic ozone loss in 1979–2010: first sign of ozone recovery","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atmospheric chemistry and physics","topic":"Atmospheric Ozone and Climate","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institut Polaire Français Paul Emile Victor; Natural Environment Research Council; Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales; Universität Heidelberg; European Commission; Goddard Space Flight Center; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Sight Research UK; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research; Macquarie University","keywords":"Ozone; Stratosphere; Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer; Atmospheric sciences; Ozone layer; Polar vortex; Ozone depletion; Environmental science; Climatology; Satellite; Meteorology; Geology; Geography; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009690792,0.0002129326,0.000319584,1.795188e-7,0.00008734107,0.00003607101,0.000173917,0.0001060769,0.01157453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001563873,0.000193613,0.00006954701,0.0003439993,0.0001777245,0.0003185492,0.00002039873,0.0001802519,0.0001568823],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000793598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004003276,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006641371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001356824,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988258,0.00002006055,0.0003123456,0.0003136014,0.0001800162,0.0003481898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999295,0.0001517098,0.0001278791,0.0002605592,0.00003899488,0.0001258397],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007690051,0.0001552186,0.721744,0.0004446598,0.00005216388,0.00002265121,0.0004642381,0.004587065,0.0008577962,0.000007143067,0.0009841792,0.270604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001498978,0.0002956675,0.9227295,0.0002025959,0.0000691634,0.00005304256,0.0008624026,0.06066368,0.003181653,0.006125496,0.00335668,0.000961133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991186,0.000666659,0.0002281724,0.0001175262,0.00008034951,0.0001325274,0.00002109733,0.00002454756,0.007543125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930308,0.0008411929,0.004033636,0.0001039786,0.0001309259,0.000006704859,0.00005170753,0.000008068316,0.001793025],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2696429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006857549889218469,"score_gpt":0.1822367313703419,"score_spread":0.1753791814811235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}