{"id":"W2054780865","doi":"10.1515/hf.2005.107","title":"Comparison of morphological and chemical properties between juvenile wood and compression wood of loblolly pine","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Holzforschung","topic":"Wood Treatment and Properties","field":"Engineering","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"North Carolina State University","keywords":"Loblolly pine; Cutting; Juvenile; Compression (physics); Chemical composition; Softwood; Pine wood; Botany; Bending; Materials science; Horticulture; Biology; Pinus <genus>; Composite material; Chemistry; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006293576,0.0001496324,0.0004130801,0.00004752319,0.00002946652,0.00001086755,0.00007408641,0.0001009207,0.0000221434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000114528,0.0001065673,0.00003377881,0.00006136856,0.0001260068,0.0001119852,0.00006806992,0.000116108,0.000002752419],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001139077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004962495,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009761678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002129161,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992566,0.00001662579,0.000315923,0.0001310778,0.0001204792,0.0001593165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997156,0.00003290488,0.00005083702,0.0001159516,0.00002321779,0.00006147849],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001281747,0.0002362362,0.1800568,0.0006213617,0.0001967118,0.000004876629,0.002360268,0.0007945215,0.7796924,0.00007076227,0.0007608997,0.03507702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001043355,0.0002398909,0.02510124,0.0001970723,0.00008223743,0.0000132746,0.0001562645,0.00506549,0.9671337,0.00003723878,0.0007222902,0.0002079219],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905668,0.008252864,0.00004144713,0.0000607986,0.00002091158,0.0001361835,0.00001231441,0.00007061462,0.0008380956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998083,0.0001086742,0.001669399,0.00000454623,0.00005645865,0.000008268015,0.00001109214,0.00001568624,0.00004287945],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1874414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4345688,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03811136191668683,"score_gpt":0.2529593505335682,"score_spread":0.2148479886168813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}