{"id":"W2054780865","doi":"10.1515/hf.2005.107","title":"Comparison of morphological and chemical properties between juvenile wood and compression wood of loblolly pine","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Holzforschung","topic":"Wood Treatment and Properties","field":"Engineering","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"North Carolina State University","keywords":"Loblolly pine; Cutting; Juvenile; Compression (physics); Chemical composition; Softwood; Pine wood; Botany; Bending; Materials science; Horticulture; Biology; Pinus <genus>; Composite material; Chemistry; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000977033,0.0001988776,0.0001269831,0.0004057803,0.0002022154,0.0002325356,0.00007521399,0.00009638379,0.0004910752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001427767,0.0001054784,0.00009063716,0.000206144,0.0001729963,0.0001283127,0.0001098334,0.0001469483,0.00006785536],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001439291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001245423,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003278545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00493772,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999359,0.00000700639,0.000004519836,0.00001519974,0.00002006933,0.00001741724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997268,0.00004454281,0.00006720327,0.00001167149,0.00004400771,0.0001056891],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001754665,0.00003554635,0.04331446,0.00003728324,0.00001317647,0.0001185726,0.000114927,0.00004507209,0.9536441,0.00001955251,0.0000169527,0.002465029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002938559,0.0001746793,0.9745233,0.000002108906,0.00000902893,0.0001222906,0.00014455,0.00007633495,0.02477382,0.000008860259,0.0001592226,0.000002855966],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996437,0.00007408485,0.00005915443,9.93016e-7,8.217315e-7,0.000002152851,0.00004617654,0.000002153673,0.0001707549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993637,0.000039599,0.0001168903,0.000004756203,0.000001319881,0.000003936676,0.0001930879,0.000002816946,0.0002738513],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003278545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00651896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03811136191668683,"score_gpt":0.2529593505335682,"score_spread":0.2148479886168813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}