{"id":"W2054784021","doi":"10.1080/02626667.2011.608069","title":"Regionalization of heavy rainfall to improve climatic design values for infrastructure: case study in Southern Ontario, Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hydrological Sciences Journal","topic":"Climate variability and models","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Homogeneous; Environmental science; Flooding (psychology); Climatology; Extreme value theory; Rain gauge; Generalized extreme value distribution; Scale (ratio); Return period; Meteorology; Geography; Physical geography; Statistics; Precipitation; Flood myth; Cartography; Mathematics; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007586003,0.0003277099,0.0002308014,0.0008511896,0.002382016,0.00115348,0.001134383,0.0003813084,0.001197361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002649184,0.0002016772,0.0003180183,0.002817795,0.0009981095,0.0002473897,0.000705249,0.0003379801,0.00008368528],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04103817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0355719,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9907861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965256,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992211,0.000133608,0.00002780728,0.00006633167,0.0002529373,0.0002982753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988201,0.0002613724,0.0001428693,0.00006575206,0.0005121608,0.0001977794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004623247,0.0004077712,0.7363198,0.0009170496,0.0001696337,0.01639703,0.02407405,0.09001103,0.01211145,0.008674581,0.009029565,0.1014256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007455776,0.0002461785,0.8860054,0.0001491675,0.0001196962,0.0007614497,0.05398532,0.0328457,0.001883186,0.000827237,0.02301711,0.0000849862],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871371,0.0002090516,0.001993369,0.0003458494,0.000007009865,0.0002374481,0.0006237062,0.00004092573,0.009405471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938287,0.0001996583,0.002585422,0.0000344033,0.00000289993,0.00004358858,0.0002484738,0.000007607295,0.003049319],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04103817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2977542,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06867753235782376,"score_gpt":0.2674672414236419,"score_spread":0.1987897090658181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}