{"id":"W2054808614","doi":"10.3182/20050703-6-cz-1902.00495","title":"FINITE HORIZON ROBUST MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL USING LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITIES","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IFAC Proceedings Volumes","topic":"Advanced Control Systems Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Model predictive control; Control theory (sociology); Horizon; Matrix (chemical analysis); Mathematical optimization; Linear matrix inequality; Stability (learning theory); Robust control; Control (management); Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering; Control system; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008773508,0.001306609,0.001572727,0.000502138,0.0005610192,0.002028995,0.00147016,0.001101184,0.004141368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002478503,0.0006189576,0.0007997421,0.0008121859,0.0007423271,0.001381925,0.001103325,0.001973271,0.0008263214],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007426943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008612478,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006972424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004948472,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992908,0.0001736468,0.00003953724,0.000136846,0.0002894664,0.00006958094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990802,0.0005288314,0.0001219568,0.00007376906,0.0001798836,0.00001542978],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001159164,0.00004276674,0.00006624355,0.0002177379,0.0000691723,0.00005986318,0.00004438433,0.9146399,0.002558566,0.02389533,0.00171156,0.05657854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007812383,0.00002222605,0.0000322802,0.000006799067,0.00000573796,0.000004414539,0.000002234798,0.9944834,0.0004737632,0.004436471,0.0005200527,0.000004870213],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003586572,0.0005638005,0.9888259,0.000137101,0.0001486745,0.00002897717,0.00006804744,0.0003863671,0.006254585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8700812,0.0008979209,0.1197783,0.0001728061,0.000221439,0.0003765675,0.0003348841,0.0001398941,0.007996925],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006972424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01386368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01602586096557283,"score_gpt":0.2350650467211813,"score_spread":0.2190391857556085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}